Valdosta, GA Zoning

9 districts. 0 overlays.
This profile is an earlier edition — some fields may be incomplete. An updated profile is in progress.

Overview

Worth knowing
  • Dual jurisdiction: City of Valdosta maintains separate zoning from Lowndes County ULDC
  • 19 distinct zoning districts in city limits; county has separate system
  • Chapter 206 (Base Zoning Districts) contains dimensional requirements; Chapter 218 (Use Regulations) available via PDF

+ 3 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

res_sf 3com 2ind 2res_mf 1cbd 1
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
R-ER-E (Estate Residential)res_sf43,560 sf35 ft[4]0.1[5]0.2[6]1[7]25[1] / 15[2] / 25[3]
R-1R-1 Residentialres_sf8,500 sf[11]35 ft[12]0.35[13]0.5[14]5[15]22[8] / 7[9] / 20[10]
R-2R-2 Residentialres_sf6,500 sf[19]35 ft[20]0.45[21]0.6[22]10[23]20[16] / 5[17] / 20[18]
MFMulti-Family/Apartmentres_mf15,000 sf[27]65 ft[28]0.6[29]1.5[30]20[31]30[24] / 12[25] / 20[26]
C-1C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial)com50 ft[35]0.6[36]1[37]20[32] / 10[33] / 20[34]
C-2C-2 (Regional Commercial)com65 ft[38]0.7[39]1.5[40] / /
CBDCBD (Central Business District)cbd80 ft[43]0.8[44]2[45]0[41] / 0[42] /
M-1M-1 (Light Industrial)ind17,500 sf[49]50 ft[50]0.5[51]0.8[52]30[46] / 20[47] / 25[48]
M-2M-2 (Heavy Industrial)ind30,000 sf[56]65 ft[57]0.6[58]1[59]40[53] / 30[54] / 40[55]

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Adopted building codes

Statewide w/ GA amendments

2024
2024
2023
2018
IECC (Residential)
2015
IECC (Commercial)
2015

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

  • Dual jurisdiction: City of Valdosta maintains separate zoning from Lowndes County ULDC
  • 19 distinct zoning districts in city limits; county has separate system
  • Chapter 206 (Base Zoning Districts) contains dimensional requirements; Chapter 218 (Use Regulations) available via PDF
  • VALOR mapping tool provides interactive zoning lookup by property
  • No state preemptions: Georgia preserves local zoning control
  • Lowndes County manages critical areas protection under Chapter 18.08 (Ordinance 409)

Formulas

Definitions

height
Maximum building height measured from grade; verify measurement methodology and rooftop exclusions in local code
lot_coverage
Building footprint as percentage of lot area; confirm whether accessory structures and impervious surfaces count
far
Gross floor area ratio
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre; verify gross vs. net acre basis
setback_front
Front property line to building face
setback_side
Side property line to building face
setback_rear
Rear property line to building face; verify corner lot and through lot exceptions
parking
Parking ratio; verify per-unit vs. per-bedroom basis and any shared parking or transit reduction

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far
max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

Sort by
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
ft
Floor area ratio
Lot coverage
%
Setbacks (F / S / R)
ft
Parking
/unit
Max density
du/ac
Min lot size
sf
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Citations
  1. [1] i
  2. [2] i
  3. [3] i
  4. [4] i
  5. [5] i
  6. [6] i
  7. [7] i
  8. [8] i
  9. [9] i
  10. [10] i
  11. [11] i
  12. [12] i
  13. [13] i
  14. [14] i
  15. [15] i
  16. [16] i
  17. [17] i
  18. [18] i
  19. [19] i
  20. [20] i
  21. [21] i
  22. [22] i
  23. [23] i
  24. [24] i
  25. [25] i
  26. [26] i
  27. [27] i
  28. [28] i
  29. [29] i
  30. [30] i
  31. [31] i
  32. [32] i
  33. [33] i
  34. [34] i
  35. [35] i
  36. [36] i
  37. [37] i
  38. [38] i
  39. [39] i
  40. [40] i
  41. [41] i
  42. [42] i
  43. [43] i
  44. [44] i
  45. [45] i
  46. [46] i
  47. [47] i
  48. [48] i
  49. [49] i
  50. [50] i
  51. [51] i
  52. [52] i
  53. [53] i
  54. [54] i
  55. [55] i
  56. [56] i
  57. [57] i
  58. [58] i
  59. [59] i

Research status

Data quality

45%completeness2 confirmed8 partial47 inferred
Documented gaps
  • Specific setback and lot coverage for most districts not accessible via public search results
  • Chapter 206 (Base Zoning Districts) PDF not fully available; dimensional standards require direct city contact
  • FAR values inferred from typical density progressions
  • Parking ratios partially documented; full standards require code review
  • No overlay districts specifically identified in research
  • Permitted uses available via Chapter 218 PDF but not fully transcribed

Known issues

schema:v1-legacypriority:lowdata:gaps-present

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.