Overview
Worth knowing
- County (not city) structure — Board of Supervisors authority, not city council
- Dual-track Form-Based Code (CP-FBC + CPN-FBC) — both OPTIONAL overlays, property owner elects in lieu of base zoning
- Special Revitalization Districts with dynamic preservation incentives — up to 500% GFA bonus (§9.2)
+ 7 more in Quirks & notes
Districts
res_sf 6res_mf 4mu 3res_th 2
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-20 | One-Family Dwelling (20,000 sf) | res_sf | 20,000 sf[1] | 35 ft[2] | — | — | 2.2[3] | — | — / — / — |
| R-10 | One-Family Dwelling (10,000 sf) | res_sf | 10,000 sf[4] | 35 ft[5] | — | — | 4.36[6] | — | — / — / — |
| R-10T | One-Family / Townhouse (10,000 sf) | res_th | 10,000 sf[7] | 35 ft[8] | — | — | 4[9] | — | — / — / — |
| R-8 | One-Family Dwelling (8,000 sf) | res_sf | 8,000 sf[10] | 35 ft[11] | — | — | 5.45[12] | — | — / — / — |
| R-6 | One-Family Dwelling (6,000 sf) | res_sf | 6,000 sf[13] | 35 ft[14] | — | — | 7.27[15] | — | — / — / — |
| R-5 | One-Family / Restricted Two-Family (5,000 sf) | res_sf | 5,000 sf[16] | 35 ft[17] | — | — | 8.7[18] | — | — / — / — |
| R15-30T | Townhouse (15-30 du/ac) | res_th | 7,500 sf[19] | 35 ft[20] | — | — | 24[21] | — | — / — / — |
| R2-7 | Two-Family / Townhouse (3,500-7,000 sf) | res_sf | 3,500 sf[22] | 35 ft[23] | — | — | 6[24] | — | — / — / — |
| RA14-26 | Multiple-Family Dwelling (14-26 du/ac) | res_mf | 6,000 sf[25] | 35 ft[26] | — | — | 24[27] | — | — / — / — |
| RA8-18 | Multiple-Family Dwelling (8-18 du/ac) | res_mf | — | 35 ft[28] | — | — | 27[29] | — | — / — / — |
| RA7-16 | Multiple-Family Dwelling (7-16 du/ac) | res_mf | — | 35 ft[30] | — | — | 30[31] | — | — / — / — |
| RA6-15 | Multiple-Family Dwelling (6-15 du/ac) | res_mf | — | 35 ft[32] | — | — | 30[33] | — | — / — / — |
| C-O-A | Mixed Use | mu | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| C-O Rosslyn | Rosslyn Coordinated Mixed-Use | mu | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| C-O Crystal City | Crystal City Coordinated Mixed-Use | mu | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
Overlays
CP-FBC
Columbia Pike Form Based Code
TODOptional overlay; property owner elects FBC in lieu of base zoning
| ground_story | Ground story use requirements per Appendix B |
|---|---|
| uses | Appendix B use tables |
CPN-FBC
Columbia Pike Neighborhoods Form Based Code
TODOptional overlay; adopted November 2013
HPO
Historic Preservation Overlay
HPLocal historic district designation
| review | Design review by HALRB (Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board) |
|---|---|
| scope | Local historic districts |
Adopted building codes
Statewide — VA Uniform SBC
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Quirks & notes
- County (not city) structure — Board of Supervisors authority, not city council
- Dual-track Form-Based Code (CP-FBC + CPN-FBC) — both OPTIONAL overlays, property owner elects in lieu of base zoning
- Special Revitalization Districts with dynamic preservation incentives — up to 500% GFA bonus (§9.2)
- Density-encoded RA district naming convention (e.g., RA14-26 = 14-26 du/ac range)
- Special exception for low/moderate income housing — modified height and density allowances (§6.2.C)
- FBC ground story use tables located in appendices (Appendix B), not inline in code text
- HPO with structure-specific density bonuses — case-by-case Board approval (§11.3)
- No explicit FAR caps in residential districts — lot-based density control only
- No special fast-track process — all discretionary review via Article 15
- National Landing (Amazon HQ2 area) — no explicit zoning overlay despite national prominence
Formulas
Definitions
- height
- Grade to highest point of structure.
- lot_coverage
- Building footprint / lot area. See §3.2 for bulk/coverage/placement.
- far
- Not explicitly capped in residential districts; lot-based density control only.
- du_ac
- Dwelling units per gross acre. Inferred from min lot area where not stated.
- impervious_cover
- setback_front
- Front property line to nearest building face. See §3.2.
- setback_side
- Side property line to nearest building face. See §3.2.
- setback_rear
- Rear property line to nearest building face. See §3.2.
- parking
- Spaces per dwelling unit. See §14.3.
Capacity calculations
- max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage- max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far- max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560- buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2- buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft- buildable_envelope_sf
buildable_width_ft * buildable_depth_ft- max_stories_approx
max_height_ft / 10- max_gfa_from_envelope
min(buildable_envelope_sf * max_stories_approx, max_gfa_sf)- parking_required
units * parking
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
Sort by
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
Citations
- [1] §5.2
- [2] §5.2
- [3] i
- [4] §5.3
- [5] §5.3
- [6] i
- [7] §5.4
- [8] §5.4
- [9] i
- [10] §5.5
- [11] §5.5
- [12] i
- [13] §5.6
- [14] §5.6
- [15] i
- [16] §5.7
- [17] §5.7
- [18] i
- [19] §5.8
- [20] §5.8
- [21] i
- [22] §5.9
- [23] §5.9
- [24] i
- [25] §6.2
- [26] §6.2
- [27] i
- [28] §6.3
- [29] i
- [30] §6.4
- [31] i
- [32] §6.5
- [33] i
Research status
Data quality
55%completeness67 confirmed15 partial20 inferred
Documented gaps
- §3.2 Bulk/Coverage/Placement setback values not extracted
- Commercial district FAR matrix not extracted
- Parking ratios not extracted (§14.3)
- Lot coverage percentages require §3.2 review
Known issues
schema:v1-legacypriority:lowdata:gaps-present
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.