Overview
Code type
euclidean
Naming convention
lot-size-encoded
Lot-size-encoded R-1 series: R-1-6 (6,000 sf min), R-1-8 (8,000 sf min), R-1-10 (10,000 sf min), R-1-X (custom, frozen). R-G Garden Apartments frozen July 2003. Town Center uses TC-P / TC-T. Design review required for all conditional uses and all 2-story R-1 additions.
Worth knowing
- Lot-size encoded R-1 districts — R-1-6 (6,000 sf), R-1-8 (8,000 sf), R-1-10 (10,000 sf) encode minimum lot area in the district name; R-1-X is custom and frozen (no new R-1-X zones). [confirmed §18.90]
- R-G Garden Apartments is a frozen district — no new R-G parcels zoned since July 22, 2003. Existing R-G uses R-1-6 side-yard standards for SF and R-2 for duplex. [confirmed §18.90]
- Design review everywhere — even R-1 two-story additions require design review permits. High threshold compared to most CA cities. [confirmed §18.90]
+ 9 more in Quirks & notes
Districts
com 6res_sf 5res_mf 2spec 1
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-1-6 | SF 6000 | res_sf | 6,000 sf[4] | —[5] | 0.4[6] | — | — | — | —[1] / —[2] / —[3] |
| R-1-8 | SF 8000 | res_sf | 8,000 sf[10] | —[11] | 0.4[12] | — | — | — | —[7] / —[8] / —[9] |
| R-1-10 | SF 10000 | res_sf | 10,000 sf[16] | —[17] | 0.4[18] | — | — | — | —[13] / —[14] / —[15] |
| R-1-X | Custom SF | res_sf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| R-2 | Two-Family | res_sf | — | —[21] | — | — | — | — | 20[19] / 7[20] / — |
| R-3 | Multi-Family | res_mf | 6,000 sf[24] | —[25] | — | — | — | —[26] | — / 10[22] / 10[23] |
| R-G | Garden Apartments (Frozen) | res_mf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| CG | General Commercial | com | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| CN | Neighborhood Commercial | com | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| CO | Office Commercial | com | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| CR | Regional Commercial | com | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| TC-P | Town Center Pedestrian | com | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| TC-T | Town Center Transitional | com | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| P | Planned District | spec | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
Overlays
DN-GG
Designated Neighborhood — Glenmoor Gardens
CONDN-MR
Designated Neighborhood — Mission Ranch
CONDN-MP
Designated Neighborhood — Mission Palms
CONMSJ
Mission San Jose Guidelines Area
HPH-I
Hillside Overlay
HSTOD
TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) Area
TODTC-P
Town Center — Pedestrian (TC-P)
DTTC-T
Town Center — Transitional (TC-T)
DTState preemptions
CA-ADU-GC§66411.7-66411.8applies
Qualifying condition
All CA cities. Fremont's R-1-6/8/10, R-1-X, R-2, R-3, R-G (existing), and mixed-use/Town Center districts must permit ADUs by-right per state law. Fremont's design-review regime for 2-story additions cannot be applied in a way that blocks ADU ministerial approval.
CA-SB9-GC§65852.21-66411.7applies
Qualifying condition
Fremont is a CA general-law city with R-1-6, R-1-8, R-1-10, and R-1-X single-family districts. SB 9 applies per-parcel conditional on exclusions. Fremont contains FEMA flood zones (Alameda Creek, bay-margin tidal areas) that exclude specific parcels, and mapped hillside areas in eastern Fremont that partially overlap CalFire Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (check per-parcel). No coastal zone (inland city; bay-margin only). Mission San Jose is a locally designated guidelines area but is not a state-registered historic district — per-parcel check required.
CA-DensityBonus-GC§65915applies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Applies to any Fremont project meeting affordability thresholds (5% VLI, 10% LI, 10% moderate for-sale, or 100% affordable). AB 1287 allows stacking to achieve up to 100% density bonus.
CA-AB2097applies
Qualifying condition
Fremont is served by BART (Fremont station and Warm Springs/South Fremont station), Amtrak Capitol Corridor (Fremont-Centerville station), and AC Transit bus network with multiple high-frequency corridors (Fremont Blvd, Mowry Ave, Thornton Ave, Mission Blvd). BART stations and Amtrak qualify as 'major transit stops' under PRC §21064.3. AC Transit routes meeting 15-min peak headway also qualify. Parcels within ½ mile of qualifying stops are AB 2097-eligible.
CA-SB423-GC§65913.4applies
Qualifying condition
SB 423 applies to sites zoned residential or mixed-use in cities not meeting their RHNA share. Fremont is under 6th-cycle RHNA (2023–2031) through ABAG/MTC with a 12,897-unit allocation. Per HCD SB 35 Determination dataset, Fremont is subject to SB 423 at the 50% affordability tier (lower-income production lagging). Applies to R-2, R-3, R-G (existing), TC-P, TC-T, CG/CN/CO/CR corridor parcels (per AB 2011 overlap), and Planned-District residential components. VHFHSZ (eastern hillsides) and sites with recent tenant displacement are excluded.
CA-AB2011-GC§65912.100applies
Qualifying condition
Fremont has commercially-zoned parcels along defined corridors (Fremont Blvd, Mowry Ave, Mission Blvd, Thornton Ave, Warm Springs Blvd, Auto Mall Pkwy) that qualify as 'commercial corridors' under AB 2011. 100% affordable projects by-right on any commercial site; mixed-income by-right on corridor sites (excluding industrial-only and office-only zones; minimum density not less than jurisdiction's default).
Non-applicable laws (2)
CA-BuildersRemedy-GC§65589.5(d)(5)confirmed
Qualifying condition
Fremont adopted its 6th-cycle Housing Element (2023–2031) for the ABAG/MTC region. HCD Housing Element Compliance Report shows Fremont with compliance_status = 'In' (reviewed 2023-03-22), record_type = 'Adopted'. Housing element certified compliant — Builder's Remedy not live.
CA-SB10not_applicable
Qualifying condition
SB 10 is permissive — it authorizes but does not require cities to zone up to 10 units/parcel near transit or urban infill via simple resolution (CEQA-exempt). No evidence Fremont has adopted an SB 10 resolution; Title 18 contains no SB 10-adoption reference. Fremont's transit-upzoning vehicles are the TOD parking provisions in §18.90 and Town Center/Planned District rezones — not SB 10.
Adopted building codes
Statewide mandatory minimum
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Quirks & notes
- Lot-size encoded R-1 districts — R-1-6 (6,000 sf), R-1-8 (8,000 sf), R-1-10 (10,000 sf) encode minimum lot area in the district name; R-1-X is custom and frozen (no new R-1-X zones). [confirmed §18.90]
- R-G Garden Apartments is a frozen district — no new R-G parcels zoned since July 22, 2003. Existing R-G uses R-1-6 side-yard standards for SF and R-2 for duplex. [confirmed §18.90]
- Design review everywhere — even R-1 two-story additions require design review permits. High threshold compared to most CA cities. [confirmed §18.90]
- R-3 adjacency setback doubles — side/rear goes from 10 ft to 20 ft when site adjacent to low-density residential GP (≤8.7 DU/ac). Accessory structures remain at 10 ft. [confirmed §18.90]
- Rear/side yard substitution flexibility — rear and side yard requirements can be swapped per §18.90 Note 6. Corner lots restricted to rear↔interior-side only. [confirmed §18.90 Note 6]
- Combination 1/2-story setbacks — each portion meets its own story's setback; wider setback goes on 2-story side; total side yards never less than 1-story requirement. [confirmed §18.90 Note 7]
- Mission San Jose Guidelines Area imposes additional setbacks beyond base zoning — guidelines document supersedes base where more restrictive. Mission San Jose historic commercial core is also TC-P. [confirmed §18.90, §18.45]
- TOD parking ceiling — R-3 parking near BART has both a MINIMUM and a MAXIMUM; non-TOD R-3 has minimum only. Reverses normal one-sided parking regulation. AB 2097 further eliminates minimum within ½ mi. [confirmed §18.90]
- Land use range enabler — R-1-6/8/10 parcels (pre-2005, no H-I overlay) can vary lot area, width, and yard in new subdivisions ≥7 lots via planning commission. Allows density increases within GP ranges. H-I-overlaid parcels excluded. [confirmed §18.90]
- Three specifically-named Designated Neighborhoods — Glenmoor Gardens, Mission Ranch, Mission Palms each operate as distinct overlays (not a single grouped overlay) with alternative roof-ridge height measurement per §18.90 Notes 8, 10. [confirmed §18.90 Notes 8, 10]
- Four Town Center historic cores — Centerville, Irvington, Mission San Jose, Niles — are each mapped TC-P districts; Warm Springs is mapped TC-T. TC functions as base replacement rather than pure overlay. [confirmed §18.45]
- codepublishing.com/CA/Fremont returns 403 Forbidden to scripted WebFetch. Table 18.90.040 (R-1 dimensional standards) and Table 18.45.020 (commercial dimensional standards) require browser-based retrieval.
Formulas
Definitions
- height
- Grade to highest point of structure; in designated neighborhoods measured grade to roof ridge (not standard method) per §18.90 Notes 8, 10.
- lot_coverage
- Building footprint / lot area; 1-story and 2-story R-1 have different maximums per §18.90 Notes 11–12.
- far
- du_ac
- impervious_cover
- setback_front
- Front property line to nearest building face.
- setback_side
- Side property line to nearest building face; rear/side substitutable per §18.90 Note 6.
- setback_rear
- Rear property line to nearest building face.
- parking
- Spaces per dwelling unit unless noted.
Capacity calculations
- max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage- max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far- max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560- buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2- buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft- buildable_envelope_sf
buildable_width_ft * buildable_depth_ft- max_stories_approx
max_height_ft / 10- max_gfa_from_envelope
min(buildable_envelope_sf * max_stories_approx, max_gfa_sf)- parking_required
units * parking- r3_adjacency_setback_rule
R-3 side/rear setback doubles from 10 ft to 20 ft when site adjacent to low-density residential GP (≤8.7 DU/ac); accessory structures remain at 10 ft (§18.90).- r1_lot_coverage_two_story_cap
2-story R-1: overall max 35% AND 2nd-floor area ≤60% of 1st-floor area OR 1,000 sf (whichever less) per §18.90 Notes 11–12.
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
Sort by
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
Primary source
Citations
- [1] §18.90
- [2] §18.90
- [3] §18.90
- [4] §18.90
- [5] §18.90
- [6] §18.90
- [7] §18.90
- [8] §18.90
- [9] §18.90
- [10] §18.90
- [11] §18.90
- [12] §18.90
- [13] §18.90
- [14] §18.90
- [15] §18.90
- [16] §18.90
- [17] §18.90
- [18] §18.90
- [19] §18.90
- [20] §18.90
- [21] §18.90
- [22] §18.90
- [23] §18.90
- [24] §18.90
- [25] §18.90
- [26] §18.90
Research status
Publication gates
| primary url present | passed | |
|---|---|---|
| no aggregator cited | passed | |
| confidence tags full form | passed | |
| overlays have parameters trigger confidence | passed | |
| preempt section city specific | passed |
Data quality
58%completeness42 confirmed16 partial
Documented gaps
- Table 18.90.040 R-1 setbacks and heights not retrieved live (platform 403).
- Table 18.45.020 commercial dimensional standards not retrieved live.
- Ch. 18.130 Hillside slope-based parameters not retrieved live.
- Ch. 18.152 (Historical) and Ch. 18.165 (Flood) not fully extracted; federal flood overlay treatment handled via California ADU-ineligibility exclusions.
- Parking ratios by land use (full table) not retrieved.
- R-3 DU/ac base density not stated in retrieved text.
Known issues
cohort:needs-dom-retrievalblocker:codepublishingdata:gaps-present
Verification
| last_verified_at | 2026-04-19T00:00:00Z |
|---|---|
| verifier_specialist | verification-pass |
| verifier_version | 1.0 |
| verification_result | passed |
| atomic_claims_checked | 46 |
| atomic_claims_passed | 46 |
| atomic_claims_failed | 0 |
| failed_claims | |
| narrative_ref | narratives/fremont-ca/frmnt-2026-04-19-v2.json |
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.