Zoning › Arkansas › Clarksville

Clarksville, AR Zoning

7 districts. 2 overlays.
This profile is an earlier edition — some fields may be incomplete. An updated profile is in progress.

Overview

Worth knowing
  • Simplified District Structure: Clarksville (pop. ~10,000) employs streamlined zoning with 8 base districts and 2 overlays; no heavy industrial (M-2) tier reflecting smaller city context. §17-3
  • Lot Coverage Not Explicitly Stated: City code does not establish explicit lot coverage percentages; presumed to defer to setback-based controls.
  • Commercial-Industrial Blending: C-2 general commercial may include light industrial uses, typical for small-town commercial patterns.

+ 2 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

res_sf 3com 2ind 1spec 1
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
R-1R-1 (Single-Family Low)res_sf8,200 sf[4]35 ft[5]—0.4[6]5.3[7]2[8]25[1] / 10[2] / 20[3]
R-2R-2 (Single-Family Medium)res_sf6,800 sf[12]35 ft[13]—0.5[14]6.4[15]2[16]20[9] / 8[10] / 15[11]
R-3R-3 (Single-Family High)res_sf5,200 sf[20]35 ft[21]—0.6[22]8[23]2[24]15[17] / 6[18] / 15[19]
C-1C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial)com3,000 sf35 ft—0.75[25]—3[26]15 / — / —
C-2C-2 (General Commercial)com5,000 sf40 ft—0.9[27]—2.5[28]10 / — / —
M-1M-1 (Light Industrial)ind10,000 sf40 ft—0.5[29]——— / 20 / —
PUDPlanned Unit Developmentspec217,800 sf[30]—————— / — / —

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

HD
Historic District
HP
§17-3(b)

Designated historic properties and districts in downtown core and scattered neighborhoods

coverage0.06[31]
design_reviewHistoric Preservation Commission review for exterior alterations, new construction, demolition
height_controlConsistent with base district; design review overlay only
signageDesign approval required for exterior and projecting signs
FPO
Floodplain Overlay District
FP
§17-2(c)

FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain; local creek and tributary drainage areas

coverage0.1[32]
freeboard2
substantial_improvement_threshold0.5

Adopted building codes

State buildings only

IBC
2021
IRC
2021
NEC
2020
IFC
2021
IECC (Residential)
2018
IECC (Commercial)
2018

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

  • Simplified District Structure: Clarksville (pop. ~10,000) employs streamlined zoning with 8 base districts and 2 overlays; no heavy industrial (M-2) tier reflecting smaller city context. §17-3
  • Lot Coverage Not Explicitly Stated: City code does not establish explicit lot coverage percentages; presumed to defer to setback-based controls.
  • Commercial-Industrial Blending: C-2 general commercial may include light industrial uses, typical for small-town commercial patterns.
  • Parking Ratios Partial: Parking standards established §17-3(d) but specific ratios per use type not directly confirmed; typical ratios presumed.
  • Minimal Overlay Complexity: As smaller town (10k population), Clarksville supports simplified overlay framework with Historic District and Floodplain overlays only.

Formulas

Definitions

height
Grade to highest point of structure
lot_coverage
Building footprint / lot area. Principal + accessory.
far
Gross floor area / lot area.
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre.
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face.
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face.
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face.
parking
Spaces per dwelling unit unless noted per 1000 sf for non-residential.

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far
max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560
parking_required
units * parking

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

—
—
Sort by —
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
◄
prev
►
next
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Citations
  1. [1] i
  2. [2] i
  3. [3] i
  4. [4] i
  5. [5] i
  6. [6] i
  7. [7] i
  8. [8] i
  9. [9] i
  10. [10] i
  11. [11] i
  12. [12] i
  13. [13] i
  14. [14] i
  15. [15] i
  16. [16] i
  17. [17] i
  18. [18] i
  19. [19] i
  20. [20] i
  21. [21] i
  22. [22] i
  23. [23] i
  24. [24] i
  25. [25] i
  26. [26] i
  27. [27] i
  28. [28] i
  29. [29] i
  30. [30] i
  31. [31] i
  32. [32] i

Research status

Data quality

58%completeness7 confirmed10 partial31 inferred
Documented gaps
  • Specific numeric values for lot area, width, setbacks, height for base districts require full ordinance text
  • FAR and lot coverage percentages inferred from setback-based controls
  • Parking standards §17-3(d) referenced but specific values not fully indexed
  • Commercial and industrial design standards not confirmed in indexed sections
  • No heavy industrial (M-2) district; structure adapted for smaller city context

Known issues

schema:v1-legacypriority:lowdata:gaps-present

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.

BentonvilleFayettevilleLittle RockOzarkParisRogersRussellvilleSpringdale