Overview
| residential_estate | letter-code (RE) |
|---|---|
| residential_sf | lot-size-encoded (R-1-{N} where N = min lot size in thousands of sf; R-1-8, R-1-10, R-1-12, R-1-20, R-1-40 observed) |
| residential_mf | density-tier index (R-2, R-3, R-4) — numbers are NOT lot-size encodings, they are intensity tiers |
| residential_central_city | letter-code (RCC) |
| commercial | tier-intensity (C-1 Neighborhood, C-2 Highway, C-3 General, C-4 CBD) |
| mobile_home | letter-code (MH) |
| industrial | letter-code (M; sometimes M-1 light) |
| planned_development | PD-{type} (PD-R, PD-C, PD-M, PD-SH student-housing, PD-TNZ traditional-neighborhood, PD-AP activity-park) |
Euclidean district-based code. Critical quirk: DUAL numeric encoding convention within one Title 10 — R-1 suffix is lot-size-in-thousands, R-2/3/4 suffix is density-tier. PD family is overlay-as-zone negotiated-standards mechanism replacing underlying base once master plan is adopted. Utah Tech (formerly Dixie State) drives PD-SH student-housing designation. Desert tortoise HCP / Red Cliffs NCA is a federal+county overlay on north/northeast fringe that effectively zeroes buildable yield regardless of Title 10 base.
Districts
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE | Residential Estate | res_sf | 40,000 sf[4] | 35 ft[5] | — | —[6] | 1[7] | 2[8] | 30[1] / 20[2] / 30[3] |
| R-1-8 | Single-Family Residential 8,000 sf min lot | res_sf | 8,000 sf[12] | 35 ft[13] | — | —[14] | 5.4[15] | 2[16] | 20[9] / 5[10] / 20[11] |
| R-1-10 | Single-Family Residential 10,000 sf min lot | res_sf | 10,000 sf[20] | 35 ft[21] | — | —[22] | 4.4[23] | 2[24] | 25[17] / 8[18] / 20[19] |
| R-1-12 | Single-Family Residential 12,000 sf min lot | res_sf | 12,000 sf[28] | 35 ft[29] | — | —[30] | 3.6[31] | 2[32] | 25[25] / 8[26] / 25[27] |
| R-1-20 | Single-Family Residential 20,000 sf min lot | res_sf | 20,000 sf[36] | 35 ft[37] | — | —[38] | 2.2[39] | 2[40] | 30[33] / 10[34] / 25[35] |
| R-1-40 | Single-Family Residential 40,000 sf min lot | res_sf | 40,000 sf[44] | 35 ft[45] | — | —[46] | 1.1[47] | 2[48] | 30[41] / 15[42] / 30[43] |
| R-2 | Multi-Family Residential Tier 2 | res_mf | 15,000 sf[52] | 45 ft[53] | — | 1[54] | 12[55] | 1.5[56] | 20[49] / 10[50] / 25[51] |
| R-3 | Multi-Family Residential Tier 3 | res_mf | 20,000 sf[60] | 55 ft[61] | — | 1.25[62] | 18[63] | 1.5[64] | 20[57] / 10[58] / 25[59] |
| R-4 | Multi-Family Residential Tier 4 | res_mf | 25,000 sf[68] | 65 ft[69] | — | 1.5[70] | 26[71] | 1.75[72] | 20[65] / 10[66] / 25[67] |
| RCC | Residential Central City | res_central_city | 10,000 sf[74] | 70 ft[75] | — | —[76] | — | —[77] | —[73] / — / — |
| MH | Mobile Home | res_mh | — | 35 ft[78] | — | — | — | 1.75[79] | — / — / — |
| C-1 | Neighborhood Commercial | com | 8,000 sf[81] | 45 ft[82] | — | 1.5[83] | — | 3.5[84] | 15[80] / — / — |
| C-2 | Highway Commercial | com | 10,000 sf[85] | 55 ft[86] | — | 2[87] | — | —[88] | — / — / — |
| C-3 | General Commercial | com | 12,000 sf[89] | 65 ft[90] | — | 2.5[91] | — | —[92] | — / — / — |
| C-4 | Central Business District (Downtown) | cbd | 5,000 sf[93] | 90 ft[94] | — | 3[95] | — | —[96] | — / — / — |
| M | Manufacturing / Industrial | ind | 20,000 sf[97] | 55 ft[98] | — | 1[99] | — | — | — / — / — |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
Overlays
Historic Downtown St. George (bounded by Main St., Tabernacle St., Bluff St.); parcels individually listed on local historic register
| height_addition_rule_pct | 15 |
|---|---|
| height_addition_rule_note | Additions to contributing structures cannot exceed original height + ~15% |
| stepback_above_ft | 45 |
| stepback_distance_ft | 15 |
| effective_practical_height_ft | 65 |
| setback_rule | Must match existing streetwall pattern (~15-20 ft front) |
| design_review | Certificate of Appropriateness required for exterior modifications, demolitions, new construction |
| administering_body | St. George Historic Preservation Commission |
Mapped parcels along conceptual future transit corridor; pre-transit designation
| density_bonus_pct | 20 |
|---|---|
| height_bonus_ft | 10 |
| parking_reduction_pct | 20 |
| affordability_trigger_pct | 25 |
| affordability_note | 25% of units at qualifying AMI required to trigger bonus package |
| adopted_year | 2024 |
| implementation_status | under-utilized through 2026 |
Parcels intersecting Virgin River, Santa Clara River, or mapped tributary channels within city limits
| no_build_setback_min_ft | 100 |
|---|---|
| no_build_setback_max_ft | 150 |
| setback_basis | Varies by floodplain designation and channel class |
| permitted_uses | parks, trails, open space, utility crossings |
| prohibited_uses | habitable structures, impervious-surface buildings |
| buildable_area_impact_note | On near-downtown parcels, buffer removes 30-40% of lot from developable area |
FEMA 1% annual-chance (100-year) flood zones per current Washington County FIRM; substantial floodplain along Virgin River and Santa Clara River
| base_flood_elevation | per FIRM/FIS |
|---|---|
| freeboard_inches_above_bfe | partial — specific value not retrieved this pass |
| no_rise_certification | required in regulatory floodway |
| substantial_improvement_threshold_pct | 50 |
| substantial_improvement_note | 50% of structure value triggers full-compliance upgrade |
| fill_excavation_permit | required |
| federal_local_review | dual (FEMA + city) |
Parcels with slopes at or above threshold (typically 20%)
| slope_threshold_pct | 20 |
|---|---|
| grading_permit_required | yes |
| density_modification | density reduced on slopes above threshold |
| geotechnical_review | required on constrained lots |
| cut_fill_limits | partial — specific limits not retrieved this pass |
Parcels within or adjacent to Red Cliffs Desert Reserve / Red Cliffs NCA boundary; HCP Zone 6 and other HCP-mapped habitat polygons on north/northeast fringe of St. George
| take_prohibition | development within mapped critical habitat requires mitigation or habitat offset |
|---|---|
| mitigation_fee | per-acre fee set by Washington County HCP administrator (fee schedule outside Title 10 scope) |
| survey_requirement | tortoise clearance survey prior to disturbance in habitat-overlap areas |
| federal_local_review | FWS + county + city |
| effect_on_zoning | parcels mapped into Reserve effectively non-developable regardless of underlying Title 10 base district |
Specific mapped parcels with adopted master plan; applied at rezone
| PD-R_residential_note | Custom density per master plan; dimensional variations negotiated at adoption |
|---|---|
| PD-C_commercial_note | Custom intensity per master plan |
| PD-M_mixed_use_du_ac_range | 20-40 |
| PD-M_ground_floor_retail_required | yes |
| PD-SH_student_housing_du_ac_max_approx | 50 |
| PD-SH_parking_ratio_with_shuttle | 0.5 |
| PD-SH_driver | Utah Tech University (formerly Dixie State) catchment |
| PD-TNZ_traditional_neighborhood_du_ac_range | 15-25 |
| PD-TNZ_mixed_use_required | yes |
| PD-AP_activity_park_note | Mixed commercial / recreational; custom |
| planning_commission_discretion | high |
State preemptions
Non-applicable laws (1)
Adopted building codes
Statewide; local may lag
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Quirks & notes
Formulas
Definitions
- height
- Grade to highest point of structure per Title 10 definitions; rooftop mechanical exclusion language not retrieved this pass
- lot_coverage
- Building footprint / lot area; accessory-structure inclusion not confirmed this pass
- far
- Gross floor area / lot area; used on C-1..C-4 and R-2/R-3/R-4 tiers; NOT used on single-family base
- du_ac
- Gross dwelling units per acre; inferred for single-family from min_lot_sf
- setback_front
- Front property line to nearest building face
- setback_side
- Side property line to nearest building face
- setback_rear
- Rear property line to nearest building face
- parking
- Spaces per dwelling unit residential; per 1000 sf commercial; Title 10 parking chapter governs
- family
- Title 10 §10-2 definition; floor set by Utah Code §10-9a-505.5 at 3 unrelated persons
Capacity calculations
- max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage_pct (where lot_coverage_pct is retrieved)- max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far (C-1..C-4 and R-2/3/4 only)- buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2- buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft- max_stories_approx
max_height_ft / 10 (typical residential; C-4 downtown may use taller floor plates)- riparian_buildable_yield
subtract 100-150 ft RWQB buffer from any parcel intersecting Virgin River / Santa Clara River before capacity math- hcp_buildable_yield
parcels mapped into Red Cliffs NCA / HCP Zone 6 are effectively zero buildable yield regardless of base district
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
- [1] i§Title 10 RE
- [2] i§Title 10 RE
- [3] i§Title 10 RE
- [4] §Title 10 RE
- [5] §Title 10 RE
- [6] n
- [7] i§Title 10 RE
- [8] i§Title 10 parking
- [9] §Title 10 R-1-8
- [10] §Title 10 R-1-8
- [11] §Title 10 R-1-8
- [12] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [13] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [14] n
- [15] i§Title 10 R-1-8
- [16] i§Title 10 parking
- [17] §Title 10 R-1-10
- [18] §Title 10 R-1-10
- [19] §Title 10 R-1-10
- [20] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [21] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [22] n
- [23] i§Title 10 R-1-10
- [24] i§Title 10 parking
- [25] §Title 10 R-1-12
- [26] §Title 10 R-1-12
- [27] §Title 10 R-1-12
- [28] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [29] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [30] n
- [31] i§Title 10 R-1-12
- [32] i§Title 10 parking
- [33] §Title 10 R-1-20
- [34] §Title 10 R-1-20
- [35] §Title 10 R-1-20
- [36] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [37] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [38] n
- [39] i§Title 10 R-1-20
- [40] i§Title 10 parking
- [41] §Title 10 R-1-40
- [42] §Title 10 R-1-40
- [43] §Title 10 R-1-40
- [44] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [45] §Title 10 R-1 table
- [46] n
- [47] i§Title 10 R-1-40
- [48] i§Title 10 parking
- [49] i§Title 10 R-2
- [50] i§Title 10 R-2
- [51] i§Title 10 R-2
- [52] §Title 10 R-2
- [53] §Title 10 R-2
- [54] §Title 10 R-2
- [55] §Title 10 R-2
- [56] §Title 10 parking chapter
- [57] i§Title 10 R-3
- [58] i§Title 10 R-3
- [59] i§Title 10 R-3
- [60] §Title 10 R-3
- [61] §Title 10 R-3
- [62] §Title 10 R-3
- [63] §Title 10 R-3
- [64] §Title 10 parking chapter
- [65] i§Title 10 R-4
- [66] i§Title 10 R-4
- [67] i§Title 10 R-4
- [68] §Title 10 R-4
- [69] §Title 10 R-4
- [70] §Title 10 R-4
- [71] §Title 10 R-4
- [72] §Title 10 parking chapter
- [73] n§Title 10 RCC
- [74] §Title 10 RCC
- [75] §Title 10 RCC
- [76] n§Title 10 RCC
- [77] §Title 10 parking chapter
- [78] i§Title 10 MH
- [79] i§Title 10 parking
- [80] i§Title 10 C-1
- [81] §Title 10 C-1
- [82] §Title 10 C-1
- [83] §Title 10 C-1
- [84] §Title 10 parking chapter
- [85] §Title 10 C-2
- [86] §Title 10 C-2
- [87] §Title 10 C-2
- [88] §Title 10 parking chapter
- [89] §Title 10 C-3
- [90] §Title 10 C-3
- [91] §Title 10 C-3
- [92] §Title 10 parking chapter
- [93] §Title 10 C-4
- [94] §Title 10 C-4
- [95] §Title 10 C-4
- [96] §Title 10 parking chapter
- [97] i§Title 10 M
- [98] i§Title 10 M
- [99] i§Title 10 M
Research status
Publication gates
| primary url present | passed | |
|---|---|---|
| no aggregator cited | passed | |
| confidence tags full form | passed | |
| overlays have parameters trigger confidence | passed | |
| preempt section city specific | passed |
Verification
| last_verified_at | 2026-04-18T23:45:00Z |
|---|---|
| verifier_specialist | verification-pass |
| verifier_version | 1.0 |
| verification_result | passed |
| atomic_claims_checked | 34 |
| atomic_claims_passed | 34 |
| atomic_claims_failed | 0 |
| failed_claims | |
| narrative_ref | narratives/st-george-ut/b0b4a747-cfe8-4b6a-aa71-4c676d0dc429.json#section-verification-pass |
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.