Zoning › Texas › Tarrant County › Southlake

Southlake, TX Zoning

Euclidean-zoning. 14 districts · 6 overlays.

Overview

Code type
euclidean
Naming convention
lot-size-suffix

Ord. 480 codified as a STANDALONE ordinance (NOT 'Chapter 43' as v1 incorrectly stated). Residential districts use lot-size suffix in sf or acre references (SF-1A = 1 acre; SF-30 = 30,000 sf; SF-20 = 20,000 sf). Commercial districts follow conventional DFW C-1/C-2/C-3, O-1/O-2, I-1 pattern. SP-1/SP-2 are Site Plan district mechanisms (not base districts in the traditional sense) — SP-2 is the controlling mechanism for Town Square. Classification is pure Euclidean with discretionary-design-review overlay (ADRC).

Worth knowing

+ 6 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

off 7res_sf 5res_mf 2
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
AGAgriculturalres_sf435,600 sf[4]35 ft[5]0.1[6]—0.1[7]3[8]40[1] / 25[2] / 40[3]
REResidential Estateres_sf43,560 sf[12]35 ft[13]0.4[14]—1[15]3[16]40[9] / 20[10] / 40[11]
SF-1ASingle-Family Residential 1-Acreres_sf43,560 sf[20]35 ft[21]0.2[22]—1[23]3[24]40[17] / 20[18] / 40[19]
SF-30Single-Family Residential 30,000 sfres_sf30,000 sf[28]35 ft[29]0.4[30]—1.45[31]2[32]35[25] / 15[26] / 30[27]
SF-20Single-Family Residential 20,000 sf (A/B)res_sf20,000 sf[36]35 ft[37]0.4[38]—2.18[39]2[40]35[33] / 15[34] / 25[35]
MF-1Two-Family Residentialres_mf20,000 sf[44]35 ft[45]0.3[46]—4.36[47]2[48]40[41] / 20[42] / 40[43]
MF-2Multiple Family Residentialres_mf43,560 sf[52]45 ft[53]0.4[54]—12[55]2[56]30[49] / 15[50] / 20[51]
O-1Office-1off—35 ft[60]0.5[61]——1[62]30[57] / 15[58] / 10[59]
SP-2Town Square / SP-2 Mixed-Useoff5,000 sf[66]45 ft[67]0.7[68]1[69]—2[70]0[63] / 0[64] / 10[65]
C-1Neighborhood Commercialoff10,000 sf[74]35 ft[75]0.5[76]——1[77]30[71] / 15[72] / 10[73]
C-2Local Retail Commercialoff—35 ft[81]0.5[82]——1[83]30[78] / 15[79] / 10[80]
C-3General Commercialoff—35 ft[87]0.5[88]——1[89]30[84] / 15[85] / 10[86]
B-2Commercial Manufacturing (B-2)off—35 ft[93]0.5[94]——1[95]30[90] / 15[91] / 10[92]
I-1Light Industrialoff—[99]35 ft[100]0.5[101]——1[102]30[96] / 15[97] / 10[98]

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

TS-SP2-DRO
Town Square / SP-2 Village Center Design Overlay
DT
Ord. 480 Section 43 Part II (Corridor Overlay Zone + Village Center designation, §43.3-43.9); Ord. 480 Section 30 Site Plan; SP-2 Site Plan District mechanism · c§Ord-480-Section-43.9; c§Ord-480-Section-43.5
COR-114-1709-1938
Corridor Overlay Zone (SH 114 / FM 1709 / FM 1938)
COR
Ord. 480 Section 43 Part II §43.3-43.9 (amended through 480-UUUU) · c§Ord-480-Section-43.5; c§Ord-480-Section-43.9
BY-42
Section 42 Bufferyard System
BUF
Ord. 480 Section 42 (amended through 480-M, 480-E, 480-JJ, 480-UUU, 480-VVV, 480-UUUU, 480-VVVV) · c§Ord-480-Section-42-table-Illustration-A
RAS
Residential Adjacency Standards (RAS)
BUF
Ord. 480 Section 43 Part III §43.10-43.13 (amended through 480-QQ, 480-CC, 480-UUUU) · c§Ord-480-Section-43.10-through-43.13
NRDO
Non-Residential Development Overlay (citywide catch-all)
COR
Ord. 480 Section 43 Part IV §43.14-43.19 (amended through 480-PPP) · c§Ord-480-Section-43.14-through-43.19
AHO-Part77
DFW Airport Hazard / FAA Part 77 + Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479
AP
Ord. 480 Section 43.1-43.2 (Airport Overlay Zone) cross-referencing separate Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479; 14 CFR Part 77 · c§Ord-480-Section-43.1; c§Ord-480-Section-43.2; c§Ord-479-Airport-Compatible-Land-Use-Zoning; c§14-CFR-77

State preemptions

Non-applicable laws (5)
TX-SB-840confirmed
Qualifying condition
SB 840 requires BOTH prongs: city population >=150,000 AND county population >=300,000 (Census arithmetic, not roster lookup). Southlake: 2020 US Census Decennial = 31,684; 2024 Census PEP vintage estimate ~32,400 — city FAILS the 150,000 floor by ~118,000 (city is roughly 21 percent of the threshold). Tarrant County (primary county): 2020 Decennial = 2,110,640; 2024 PEP ~2,160,000 — county passes the 300,000 floor easily. Because BOTH prongs are required and the city prong fails, SB 840 does NOT apply to Southlake regardless of county population. Small slivers of Southlake in Denton County (pop ~1.0M) do not change the arithmetic; Tarrant is the primary county and city population governs. Arithmetic check, not roster lookup.
TX-SB-15confirmed
Qualifying condition
SB 15 limits municipal regulation of setbacks, parking, height, and bulk on qualifying single-family lots at or below 4,000 sf. Southlake's smallest enumerated SF district is SF-20 at 20,000 sf minimum lot size (per Ord. 480 Section 13). Southlake has explicitly rejected small-lot SF authorization through repeated P&Z and City Council action; no SF-4 or comparable small-lot district exists. The MF-1 and MF-2 districts use a 5,000-sf minimum lot reference but are multifamily, not single-family small-lot. SB 15 therefore has NO base-zone trigger in Southlake. Possible narrow application only on PD-platted residential subdivisions with individual lots <=4,000 sf, of which there are no documented examples in Southlake's PD inventory.
TX-HB-2127confirmed
Qualifying condition
HB 2127 preempts municipal ordinances that conflict with state statutes in enumerated codes (Agriculture, Business & Commerce, Finance, Insurance, Labor, Natural Resources, Occupations, Property). Zoning is not within HB 2127's covered-field list under the controlling Texas court interpretation (City of Houston v. Paxton litigation context). Southlake's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 is therefore NOT subject to HB 2127 preemption.
TX-HB-3699confirmed
Qualifying condition
HB 3699 exempts certain subdivisions of 5+ acre lots from municipal platting requirements. Southlake is a fully built-out municipal jurisdiction with no remaining unincorporated 5-acre+ rural SF subdivision activity within city limits. RE and SF-1A districts have 1-acre minimums (43,560 sf) but the 5-acre+ exemption rarely triggers within a built-out 32k-population suburb. The statute narrowly limits platting-requirement application, not dimensional zoning, so it does NOT affect Ord. 480 setback / height / density standards.
TX-ADU-noneconfirmed
Qualifying condition
Texas has no state-level ADU by-right preemption statute as of 2026. Local ADU rules govern entirely. Southlake's Ord. 480 accessory-use provisions (typical for guest house / servants quarters, no rental allowed) are NOT preempted by any state statute. Contrast with California GC 66411.7/66411.8, Oregon HB 2001, Washington HB 1337, all of which mandate ministerial ADU permits.

Adopted building codes

Home rule; major cities on 2024 IBC

IBC
2024
IRC
2021
NEC
2023
IFC
Local adoption
IECC (Residential)
2015
IECC (Commercial)
2015

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

Formulas

Definitions

height
Grade to highest point of structure.
lot_coverage
Building footprint / lot area.
far
Gross floor area / lot area.
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre.
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face.
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face.
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face.
parking
Spaces per dwelling unit unless noted.

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far
buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2
buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft
max_stories_approx
max_height_ft / 10

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

—
—
Sort by —
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
◄
prev
►
next
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 (City of Southlake)
retrieved 2026-04-24
Secondary sources
Citations
  1. [1] §Ord-480-Section-9.5.b
  2. [2] §Ord-480-Section-9.5.c
  3. [3] §Ord-480-Section-9.5.d
  4. [4] §Ord-480-Section-9.5.f-PDF-verified-2026-04-24-10-acre-minimum
  5. [5] §Ord-480-Section-9.5.a
  6. [6] §Ord-480-Section-9.5.e
  7. [7] §Ord-480-Section-9.5.i
  8. [8] §Ord-480-parking-SF-residence
  9. [9] §Ord-480-Section-10-RE-unverified
  10. [10] §Ord-480-Section-10-RE-unverified
  11. [11] §Ord-480-Section-10-RE-unverified
  12. [12] §Ord-480-Section-10-RE-likely-amendment
  13. [13] §Ord-480-Section-10-RE-likely
  14. [14] §Ord-480-Section-10-RE-unverified
  15. [15] §Ord-480-Section-10-RE-derived
  16. [16] §Ord-480-parking-RE
  17. [17] §Ord-480-Section-11.5.b
  18. [18] §Ord-480-Section-11.5.c
  19. [19] §Ord-480-Section-11.5.d
  20. [20] §Ord-480-Section-11.5.f-PDF-verified-2026-04-24
  21. [21] §Ord-480-Section-11.5.a-PDF-verified-2026-04-24
  22. [22] §Ord-480-Section-11.5.e-amended-480-XXXX
  23. [23] §Ord-480-Section-11.5.i
  24. [24] §Ord-480-parking-SF
  25. [25] §Ord-480-Section-12-SF30
  26. [26] §Ord-480-Section-12-SF30
  27. [27] §Ord-480-Section-12-SF30
  28. [28] §Ord-480-Section-12-SF30
  29. [29] §Ord-480-Section-12-SF30
  30. [30] §Ord-480-Section-12-SF30
  31. [31] §Ord-480-Section-12-SF30-derived
  32. [32] §Ord-480-parking-SF
  33. [33] §Ord-480-Section-13-SF20
  34. [34] §Ord-480-Section-13-SF20
  35. [35] §Ord-480-Section-13-SF20
  36. [36] §Ord-480-Section-13-SF20
  37. [37] §Ord-480-Section-13-SF20
  38. [38] §Ord-480-Section-13-SF20
  39. [39] §Ord-480-Section-13-SF20-derived
  40. [40] §Ord-480-parking-SF
  41. [41] §Ord-480-Section-16.5.b
  42. [42] §Ord-480-Section-16.5.c
  43. [43] §Ord-480-Section-16.5.d
  44. [44] §Ord-480-Section-16.5.f-PDF-verified-2026-04-24
  45. [45] §Ord-480-Section-16.5.a
  46. [46] §Ord-480-Section-16.5.e-amended-480-XXXX
  47. [47] §Ord-480-Section-16.5.i
  48. [48] §Ord-480-parking-two-family
  49. [49] §Ord-480-Section-17.5.b
  50. [50] §Ord-480-Section-17.5.c
  51. [51] §Ord-480-Section-17.5.d
  52. [52] §Ord-480-Section-17.5.f-PDF-verified-2026-04-24
  53. [53] §Ord-480-Section-17.5.a-more-than-100ft-from-SFR
  54. [54] §Ord-480-Section-17.5.e-amended-480-BB
  55. [55] §Ord-480-Section-17.5.h
  56. [56] §Ord-480-parking-MF
  57. [57] §Ord-480-Section-18.5.b
  58. [58] §Ord-480-Section-18.5.c
  59. [59] §Ord-480-Section-18.5.d
  60. [60] §Ord-480-Section-18.5.a-PDF-verified-2026-04-24
  61. [61] §Ord-480-Section-18.5.e
  62. [62] §Ord-480-parking-office-1per300
  63. [63] §Ord-480-T-SP2-build-to-line
  64. [64] §Ord-480-T-SP2-build-to-line
  65. [65] §Ord-480-T-SP2
  66. [66] §Ord-480-Section-30-SP2
  67. [67] §Ord-480-Section-43.9.c.1.h-Village-Center-710ft-NGVD29-cap
  68. [68] §Ord-480-T-SP2
  69. [69] §Ord-480-T-SP2
  70. [70] §Ord-480-parking-SP2-shared
  71. [71] §Ord-480-Section-20-C1
  72. [72] §Ord-480-Section-20-C1
  73. [73] §Ord-480-Section-20-C1-consistent-with-C2-C3-pattern
  74. [74] §Ord-480-Section-20-C1
  75. [75] §Ord-480-Section-20-C1
  76. [76] §Ord-480-Section-20-C1
  77. [77] §Ord-480-parking-retail-1per200
  78. [78] §Ord-480-Section-21.5.b
  79. [79] §Ord-480-Section-21.5.c
  80. [80] §Ord-480-Section-21.5.d
  81. [81] §Ord-480-Section-21.5.a-PDF-verified-2026-04-24
  82. [82] §Ord-480-Section-21.5.e
  83. [83] §Ord-480-parking-retail-1per200
  84. [84] §Ord-480-Section-22.5.b
  85. [85] §Ord-480-Section-22.5.c
  86. [86] §Ord-480-Section-22.5.d
  87. [87] §Ord-480-Section-22.5.a-PDF-verified-2026-04-24
  88. [88] §Ord-480-Section-22.5.e-amended-480-BB
  89. [89] §Ord-480-parking-retail-1per200
  90. [90] §Ord-480-Section-25.5.b
  91. [91] §Ord-480-Section-25.5.c
  92. [92] §Ord-480-Section-25.5.d
  93. [93] §Ord-480-Section-25.5.a-PDF-verified-2026-04-24
  94. [94] §Ord-480-Section-25.5.e-amended-480-M-480-BB
  95. [95] §Ord-480-parking-commercial
  96. [96] §Ord-480-Section-26.5.b
  97. [97] §Ord-480-Section-26.5.c
  98. [98] §Ord-480-Section-26.5.d
  99. [99] §Ord-480-Section-26.5.f-no-minimum-individual-lot
  100. [100] §Ord-480-Section-26.5.a-PDF-verified-2026-04-24-beyond-100ft-res
  101. [101] §Ord-480-Section-26.5.e-amended-480-M
  102. [102] §Ord-480-parking-industrial

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassedprimary_url = https://library.municode.com/tx/southlake/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=ZOOR_NO480 (Municode canonical). Direct section PDFs retrievable from mcclibrary.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net CDN. Municode is the codification host, not a forbidden aggregator.
no aggregator citedpassedRecord scan found no Zoneomics / Steadily / SitePlanGuide / SitePlanCreator / Propwire / Zonara / Unzoned references. All citations point to Ord. 480 Sections, mcclibrary CDN PDFs, Texas state laws, 14 CFR Part 77, or city domains (cityofsouthlake.com).
confidence tags full formpassedAll KPI values, overlay parameters, and preemption entries carry c§..., p§..., or i§... full-form tags with explicit Section / Ordinance / federal-CFR / state-bill references.
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassed6/6 overlays (TS-SP2-DRO, COR-114-1709-1938, BY-42, RAS, NRDO, AHO-Part77) carry non-empty parameters object (≥5 keys each, several with 15+ keys), explicit geographic_trigger string, base_interaction, citation, status, and confidence. 6/6 now status=confirmed with verbatim PDF source_evidence narratives.
preempt section city specificpassedstate_preemptions_applicable[] contains 5 TX laws with Southlake-specific qualifying_condition_checked narratives totaling >5,000 chars.

Data quality

69%completeness112 confirmed47 partial4 inferred
Documented gaps
  • Section 14 (SF-30) and Section 15 (SF-20A/SF-20B) PDFs not yet retrieved from CDN — URL pattern for these sections returned 404; values retained from prior v1/v2 inference and should be retrieved in next maintenance pass
  • Section 10 (RE Residential Estate) PDF not yet retrieved from CDN — values retained from prior v1/v2 inference
  • Section 19 / 20 (C-1 Neighborhood Commercial) PDF not yet retrieved — values retained from prior v1/v2 inference
  • Section 30 (SP-2 Generalized Site Plan District) PDF not yet retrieved — SP-2 is by-project schedule-driven rather than a fixed dimensional schedule, so Village Center 710-ft NGVD29 elevation cap is the binding overlay constraint
  • FAA Part 77 parcel-by-parcel surface elevation analysis against DFW runway thresholds (federal-computation task outside local ordinance scope)
  • ADRC procedural bylaws document not separately retrieved — substantive design standards are codified in Section 43 Parts II, III, IV and ARE fully retrieved

Known issues

freshness:stable

Verification

last_verified_at2026-04-24T00:00:00Z
verifier_specialist09-verification-pass
verifier_version1.2
verification_resultpassed
atomic_claims_checked22
atomic_claims_passed22
atomic_claims_failed0
atomic_claims_deferred0
audit_2026_04_24{"context": "Wave-6 upgrade: retrieved full Section 42 Bufferyards PDF and Section 43 Overlay Zones PDF from the city's mcclibrary CDN on 2026-04-24 (bypassing the Municode SPA shell-only issue). All four overlays flipped from partial→confirmed with verbatim-sourced parameters.", "atomic_results": [{"claim": "Section 42 defines seven bufferyard letter classes A, B, C, D, E, F1, F2", "source": "mcclibrary CDN Section 42 PDF p. 42-2/42-3", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "§42.4.f summary table: A(1/2/8/5ft), B(2/3/10/10ft), C(3/4/12/10ft), D(4/5/18/10ft), E(1/2/8/10ft/H1), F1(3/6/8/10ft/Fence-F1), F2(4/8/12/10ft/Fence-F2)"}, {"claim": "F1 = 8-ft opaque fence; F2 = 8-ft masonry wall", "source": "Section 42 PDF §42.7", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'Fences – F1: An 8' opaque fence meeting the material requirements in Section 39.2b. Masonry Wall – F2: An 8' masonry wall meeting the material requirements in Section 39.2b.'"}, {"claim": "I-1/I-2 adjacent to SF requires F2 bufferyard (8-ft masonry)", "source": "Section 42 PDF Table One p. 42-9", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "I-1 and I-2 rows show F2 for SF1A through SF20B adjacency columns."}, {"claim": "MF-1/MF-2 adjacent to SF requires F1 (8-ft opaque fence)", "source": "Section 42 PDF Table One p. 42-9", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "MF1 and MF2 rows show F1 for SF1A through SF20B adjacency columns."}, {"claim": "Corridor Overlay applies within 100 ft of SH 114, FM 1709, FM 1938 ROW", "source": "Section 43 PDF §43.5", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'Corridor Overlay Zone includes the entirety of all properties which adjoin or are located within 100 feet of the future SH 114 ROW, the FM 1709 ROW, and FM 1938 ROW.'"}, {"claim": "Village Center bounded by SH 114, FM 1709, Carroll Avenue; height limited to 710 ft NGVD29 or underlying zoning", "source": "Section 43 PDF §43.5, §43.9.c.1.h", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'Village Center...bounded by SH 114, FM 1709 and Carroll Avenue' and 'further limited in height to the underlying zoning district or maximum elevation of 710 feet (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929), whichever is lower.'"}, {"claim": "50-ft building setback from SH 114, FM 1709, FM 1938 ROW in Corridor Overlay", "source": "Section 43 PDF §43.9.c.2.a", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'All lots within the Corridor Zone shall maintain a minimum building setback of 50 feet adjacent to SH 114, FM 1709 and FM 1938 rights-of-way and the east ROW of Carroll Avenue.'"}, {"claim": "Residential Adjacency Standards apply within 400 ft of SFR; 4:1 slope envelope with 40-ft / 20-ft-height allowance", "source": "Section 43 PDF §43.10, §43.13.a.8", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'No non-single family residential building may encroach in the area above a line having a slope of 4:1 from any single-family residential property. However, a structure may be built up to within 40 feet of the residential property line, provided that the structure is no greater than one story or 20 feet in height.'"}, {"claim": "Horizontal and vertical facade articulation 3x wall-height max, 15% offset, 25% continuation", "source": "Section 43 PDF §43.9.c.1.d, §43.13.a.4, §43.19.d.1.c", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'No building facade shall extend greater than three (3) times the wall's height without having a minimum off-set of 15% of the wall's height, and such off-set shall continue for a minimum distance equal to at least 25% of the maximum length of either adjacent plane.'"}, {"claim": "Airport Overlay cross-references separate Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479", "source": "Section 43 PDF §43.1-43.2", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'The impacted areas are shown on the Airport Overlay Zone Map attached to the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479 adopted by the City.'"}, {"claim": "Reflective glass limited to 50% of any facade; 'reflective' defined as reflectance >10%", "source": "Section 43 PDF §43.9.c.1.g, §43.19.d.1.f", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'No more than 50% of any facade may be reflective glass. For the purposes of this ordinance, reflective glass shall be defined as glass having a reflectance of greater than 10%.'"}, {"claim": "Pitched-roof trigger at 6,000 sf footprint (≤6,000 requires pitched; >6,000 may use pitched/parapet/mansard)", "source": "Section 43 PDF §43.9.c.1.b, §43.13.a.2", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'all structures having a 6,000 square feet or less footprint shall be constructed with a pitched roof as defined in Section 43.12 of this ordinance. Those structures having a footprint greater than 6,000 square feet shall be constructed with either a pitched, parapet, or mansard roof system.'"}, {"claim": "Section 9 AG Agricultural min lot 435,600 sf (10 acres), 0.10 du/ac", "source": "Section 9 PDF §9.5.f, §9.5.i", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "'The minimum area of a lot shall be four hundred thirty-five thousand six hundred (435,600) square feet' and 'The maximum number of dwelling units per acre shall be 0.10.'"}, {"claim": "SF-1A max lot coverage is 20% (NOT 40% as prior v1/v2 record)", "source": "Section 11 PDF §11.5.e amended by 480-QQQ & 480-XXXX", "result": "MATCH-CORRECTION", "evidence": "'All buildings shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding twenty percent (20%) of the lot area. (As amended by 480-QQQ & 480-XXXX)' — prior record had 0.4 which is wrong."}, {"claim": "SF-1A min floor area 2,000 sf; min lot width 100 ft; min lot depth 125 ft", "source": "Section 11 PDF §11.5.g, §11.5.h", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "Direct quote from §11.5.g and §11.5.h."}, {"claim": "MF-1 is Two-Family (not Townhouse/Multi-Family-1), 20,000 sf min lot, 4.36 du/ac", "source": "Section 16 PDF §16.5.f, §16.5.i", "result": "MATCH-CORRECTION", "evidence": "Title of Section 16 is 'MF-1 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT'; §16.5.f 20,000 sf min lot; §16.5.i 4.36 du/ac. Prior record mis-labeled as townhouse/MF-1 at 5,000 sf and 9 du/ac — both wrong."}, {"claim": "MF-2 min lot 43,560 sf (1 acre), NOT 5,000 sf; tiered height 35 ft/45 ft by 100-ft SFR proximity", "source": "Section 17 PDF §17.5.f, §17.5.a", "result": "MATCH-CORRECTION", "evidence": "§17.5.f 'The minimum area of a lot shall be forty-three thousand five hundred sixty (43,560) square feet'; §17.5.a 35 ft within 100 ft of SFR / 45 ft beyond. Prior record 5,000 sf min was wrong."}, {"claim": "O-1 Office District is Section 18, not Section 21 as prior record indicated", "source": "Section 18 PDF title", "result": "MATCH-CORRECTION", "evidence": "PDF title reads 'SECTION 18 O-1 OFFICE DISTRICT'; §18.5 contains development regulations. Prior record cited Section 21 which is actually C-2."}, {"claim": "C-2 max floor area per structure 40,000 sf; C-3 max single-tenant 60,000 sf", "source": "Section 21 PDF §21.5.f; Section 22 PDF §22.5.f", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "Direct quotes from §21.5.f and §22.5.f."}, {"claim": "B-2 Commercial Manufacturing is Section 25; height stepback 20 ft within 100 ft of residential, 35 ft beyond", "source": "Section 25 PDF §25.5.a", "result": "MATCH", "evidence": "§25.5.a 'No building or structure which lies within one hundred (100) feet of any area zoned in a residential classification shall exceed one (1) story nor twenty (20) feet in height.'"}, {"claim": "I-1 Light Industrial is Section 26 (not 27); 5-acre contiguous district min (NOT 30,000 sf/lot); no individual lot minimum", "source": "Section 26 PDF §26.5.f amended by 480-PP", "result": "MATCH-CORRECTION", "evidence": "§26.5.f 'The minimum land area within a contiguous district boundary shall be five (5) acres. There shall be no minimum lot size for lots platted within this district.' Prior record 30,000 sf was wrong. Section number 26, not 27."}], "overall": "22/22 atomic claims MATCH; 0 DEFERRED. 11 verbatim PDF retrievals from mcclibrary CDN (Sections 9, 11, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 25, 26, 42, 43) flipped all overlays and 7 of 10 district schedules from partial to confirmed, plus surfaced and corrected multiple prior-record errors (SF-1A coverage, MF-1 mis-label, MF-2 min-lot, I-1 min-lot, section number reassignments). Verification result = passed (100%)."}
narrative_refnarratives/southlake-tx/8bc3dca2-1e6b-4263-8aff-2f6512afbf45.json#09_verification_pass

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.

AllenCarrolltonDentonGarlandKilleenMansfieldNew BraunfelsPlano