Overview
| res_sf | use-type-index |
|---|---|
| res_mf | density-encoded |
| com | letter-code |
| ind | letter-code |
| corridor | intensity-tier |
Pflugerville runs a Euclidean base-zoning system (§4.2 residential + §4.3 non-residential) alongside a form-based Corridor District system (§4.4 CL3/CL4/CL5) specifically for the SH130 and SH45 corridors, plus discretionary PUD (§4.5.3) for large mixed-use projects. MF district numbers are density-encoded (MF-10 = 10 du/ac, MF-20 = 20 du/ac); SF/2-F/A/MH districts use lot-area-based dimensional control; commercial districts are letter-coded (O/NS/R/GB1/GB2) with intensity tier. Corridor districts use build-to-lines, max density floors (min 6–20 du/ac), height up to 120 ft in CL5 with MF-Urban designation, and impervious cover up to 85% — distinctly form-based and intended for SH130/SH45-adjacent parcels. Classification = hybrid-pd because Corridor Districts + PUD together can supersede the Euclidean base in any corridor/large-site context; neither pure Euclidean nor pure form-based fits.
- CL3/CL4/CL5 Corridor Districts are BASE zones (§4.4), not overlays — applied specifically to parcels along SH130 and SH45 corridors. Form-based (build-to-lines, min-density floors, impervious-cover ceilings) within an otherwise Euclidean UDC. Ord. 1623-24-04-23 (eff. 2024-04-23) is the current corridor-district amendment.
- Downtown District Overlay (DD) has FOUR sub-districts — Downtown Core (0 ft setback, 60 ft height, 2-story minimum, 100% lot coverage), Transitional Compatibility Zone (15 ft front, 35 ft height, 70% coverage), Pfluger Tract, South Downtown (SoDo), and Western Gateway. Core requires ≥50% of minimum parking OFF-SITE (§4.5.1).
- Pecan Street special treatment inside DD Core — 25 ft build-to-line (vs. 15 ft elsewhere in Core) and 25 ft front setback preserve historic streetwall character.
+ 11 more in Quirks & notes
Districts
| Code | Name | Category | Min lot | Height | Coverage | FAR | Du/ac | Parking | Setbacks F/S/R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Agriculture / Development Reserve | spec | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| SF-E | Single Family Estate | res_sf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| SF-S | Single Family Suburban | res_sf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| SF-R | Single Family Residential | res_sf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| SF-MU | Single Family Mixed Use Residential | res_sf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| 2-F | Two Family Residential | res_sf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| MF-10 | Multi-Family 10 | res_mf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| MF-20 | Multi-Family 20 | res_mf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| MH | Manufactured Housing | res_mf | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| PF | Public Facilities and Open Space | spec | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| O | Office | office | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| NS | Neighborhood Service | retail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| R | Retail | retail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| GB1 | General Business 1 | com | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| GB2 | General Business 2 | com | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| CI | Campus Industrial | ind | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| LI | Light Industrial | ind | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| GI | General Industrial | ind | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| CL3 | Corridor Level 3 — Suburban (SH130/SH45 Neighborhood-scale) | mu | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| CL4 | Corridor Level 4 — Urban (SH130/SH45 Mixed-Use/Innovation) | mu | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
| CL5 | Corridor Level 5 — Urban Center (SH130/SH45 Dense Mixed-Use Core) | mu | — | — | — | — | — | — | — / — / — |
Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found
Overlays
State preemptions
Non-applicable laws (1)
Adopted building codes
Home rule; major cities on 2024 IBC
Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.
Amendment history
| Date | Kind | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-19 | retrieved at | |
| 2024-04-23 | amendment effective | Ord. 1623-24-04-23 (Corridor Districts §4.4 update) |
| 2018-07-10 | amendment effective | Ord. 1355-18-07-10 (Zoning Districts Established §4.1) |
| 2015-02-24 | adoption | Ord. 1203-15-02-24 (UDC adoption) |
Quirks & notes
- CL3/CL4/CL5 Corridor Districts are BASE zones (§4.4), not overlays — applied specifically to parcels along SH130 and SH45 corridors. Form-based (build-to-lines, min-density floors, impervious-cover ceilings) within an otherwise Euclidean UDC. Ord. 1623-24-04-23 (eff. 2024-04-23) is the current corridor-district amendment.
- Downtown District Overlay (DD) has FOUR sub-districts — Downtown Core (0 ft setback, 60 ft height, 2-story minimum, 100% lot coverage), Transitional Compatibility Zone (15 ft front, 35 ft height, 70% coverage), Pfluger Tract, South Downtown (SoDo), and Western Gateway. Core requires ≥50% of minimum parking OFF-SITE (§4.5.1).
- Pecan Street special treatment inside DD Core — 25 ft build-to-line (vs. 15 ft elsewhere in Core) and 25 ft front setback preserve historic streetwall character.
- MF-10 and MF-20 district numbers are density-encoded: 10 du/ac and 20 du/ac respectively; lot area is N/A (no minimum) in these districts.
- SB 840 does NOT apply — Pflugerville (~67K) below 150K city population threshold. City retains full legislative authority over density, height, setbacks, parking on commercial/office/retail parcels.
- SB 15 applies statewide — small-lot deregulation (≤4,000 sf) constrains Pflugerville's authority over setbacks/parking/height/FAR on CL3 townhome lots (2,500 sf) and any legacy sub-4,000 sf lots.
- Austin Executive Airport Hazard Overlay (AEAH) — 14 CFR Part 77-aligned approach/conical/horizontal/transitional surfaces; 150-ft horizontal surface cap above 620 MSL airport elevation (770 ft MSL absolute); depicted on KSA Engineers' April 2015 map (§4.5.4).
- 685 Commercial Park Overlay — highly prescriptive architectural standards for 'Development Area 2' including prohibited 'pink and gold glass,' required gable/hip roof pitch 1:12–8:12, and permitted chain-link fencing up to 8 ft — distinctive standards for this single SH130/FM685 subdivision.
- Building height setback rule — structures >20 ft abutting single-family residential require 1 ft additional setback per 1 ft additional height (commercial) OR 2 ft setback per 1 ft height step (multi-family). Rule applies across §4.3 and §4.4.
- No dedicated Floodplain overlay in UDC §4.5 — flood regulation lives in Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (Subchapter 9 or standalone), not as a mapped §4.5 overlay district. V1 inferred 'FH' overlay code is NOT the actual UDC structure.
- No dedicated Historic Preservation, Stream/Environmental, TOD, or Affordable Housing overlay — only 4 overlays in §4.5 (DD, 685, PUD, AEAH). Environmental handled via Subchapter 12 (Tree Preservation) and Subchapter 14 (Public Parkland/Open Space); historic character captured via DD Core sub-district.
- Campus Industrial (CI) district permits max 85 ft height — highest non-corridor, non-overlay district; positioned for corporate/R&D campuses and (per market pattern) data center use. GI goes to 100 ft.
- PUD district (§4.5.3) is a floating district — minimum 20 acres (or smaller with Council consent); project-specific regulating plan and development code supersede base; Council-approved minor amendments require meeting 8 criteria, major require new application.
- EncodePlus SPA platform — JS-rendered document viewer; deep-section HTML fetches return navigation shell only. Reliable path is /doc-view.aspx?tocid=XXX&print=1 print-view which returns full section text.
Formulas
Definitions
- height
- Grade to highest point of structure (including roof peak/equipment) per UDC §4.2–§4.4 tables.
- lot_coverage
- Building footprint / lot area.
- impervious_cover
- All hardscape (buildings, driveways, parking, sidewalks) / lot area; capped per district in §4.3/§4.4.
- far
- Gross floor area / lot area (not consistently published in §4.3 dimensional table).
- du_ac
- Dwelling units per gross acre; explicit in MF-10 (10 du/ac) and MF-20 (20 du/ac); MH capped at 8 du/ac; corridor districts use min-density floors + max ceilings.
- setback_front
- Front property line to nearest building face.
- setback_side
- Side property line to nearest building face (interior vs. street side distinguished in corridor districts).
- setback_rear
- Rear property line to nearest building face.
- build_to_line
- Maximum front setback requirement (CL4/CL5 require building placed <25 ft from property line on >50% of frontage, except toll/frontage roads).
- parking
- Spaces per dwelling unit; Downtown Overlay requires ≥50% of minimum required parking to be off-site.
Capacity calculations
- max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage- max_impervious_sf
lot_area_sf * impervious_cover- max_units_from_density
lot_area_sf * du_ac / 43560- building_height_setback_rule
For structures >20 ft abutting single-family residential zoning: 1 ft additional height requires 2 ft additional setback (commercial base) OR 5 ft (multi-family base). Per §4.4 corridor districts.
Massing explorer
Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.
| District | Category | Height | FAR | Coverage | Setbacks | Parking | Density | Min lot | Overlays |
|---|
Sources & references
EncodePlus is a JS-rendered document viewer; per-section HTML deep-fetches return navigation shell only, but /doc-view.aspx?tocid=004.00x&print=1 print-view successfully returned full Subchapter 4 text. Core district roster + overlays + CL3/4/5 corridor parameters all captured from primary print-view on 2026-04-19. Secondary v1→v2 flip: v1 mis-inferred Euclidean SF-E/SF-S/SF-C/TH/MF-L/MF-M/MF-H + NC/GC/RC/OP/MU-TC/LI/HI/PUB taxonomy (extrapolated from Austin/Round Rock precedent). Actual district list is 9 residential (A, SF-E, SF-S, SF-R, SF-MU, 2-F, MF-10, MF-20, MH) + 9 non-residential (PF, O, NS, R, GB1, GB2, CI, LI, GI) + 3 corridor (CL3, CL4, CL5 — form-based) + 4 overlays (DD, 685 Commercial Park, PUD, Austin Executive Airport Hazard). V1 overlay roster (FH, TC-130, MU-SH, SC, ETJ) was entirely inferred and is NOT present in the actual UDC by those codes — TC-130 corresponds to CL3/CL4/CL5 base districts (not an overlay), MU-SH has no counterpart (Stone Hill Town Center is a retail development, not a zoning overlay), FH/floodplain is handled in Subchapter 9 design provisions not as a mapped overlay in §4.5, ETJ is a jurisdictional concept not an overlay.
- https://www.pflugervilletx.gov/295/Unified-Development-Code
- https://pflugervilletx.gov/city-government/development-services-center/planning-department/unified-development-code
- https://www.pflugervilletx.gov/city-government/development-services-center/planning-department/development-process/zoning
- https://www.pflugervilletx.gov/225/Floodplain
- https://maps.pflugervilletx.gov/
Research status
Publication gates
| primary url present | passed | source.primary_url = https://online.encodeplus.com/regs/pflugerville/doc-viewer.aspx (city-hosted EncodePlus; not an aggregator) |
|---|---|---|
| no aggregator cited | passed | scan clean — no zoneomics/steadily/siteplanguide/etc. cited |
| confidence tags full form | passed | 19/22 districts fully confirmed with §4.2/§4.3/§4.4.1 citations; SF-MU is partial (table incomplete), A/SF-E/SF-S/SF-R/2-F derive du_ac from lot-area ratio (tagged p§4.2); every confirmed numeric carries a §-citation |
| overlays have parameters trigger confidence | passed | DD (§4.5.1), 685 (§4.5.2), PUD (§4.5.3), AEAH (§4.5.4) all have non-empty parameters, geographic_trigger, status:confirmed, citation. FH partial (documented under_review with paired companion). HP/ENV/TOD/AH not_found with search_performed companion. CORR not_applicable with reason. |
| preempt section city specific | passed | 2 laws with city-specific qualifying_condition_checked — SB 840 (applies:false with numeric population gates documented) + SB 15 (applies:true with CL3 townhome 2,500 sf trigger documented) |
Known issues
Other cities in this state
Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.