Pearland, TX Zoning

Euclidean-zoning. 24 districts · 9 overlays · 3 applicable state preemptions.

Overview

Code type
euclidean
Naming convention
mixed
Naming convention by category
residential_sf_suburbanlot-size-encoded (SR-15=15,000 sf; SR-12=12,000 sf)
residential_sf_standarduse-type-index (R-1=8,800; R-2=7,000; R-3=6,000; R-4=5,000 — lower number = larger lot, NOT inverse of lot size)
commercial_industrialletter-code (OP, NS, GB, GC, M-1, M-2)
mixed_use_district_specificplace-name-anchored (SPD Spectrum; C-MU Cullen; G/O-MU Garden/O'Day; OT Old Townsite; BP-288 SH-288)

Classic Texas Euclidean UDC with place-name mixed-use districts tied to specific corridors (Cullen Blvd, Garden/O'Day, Spectrum area, Old Townsite downtown, and BP-288 along SH-288). SF residential naming DIVERGES from typical TX lot-size-encoded: R-1 through R-4 are sequential with DECREASING minimum lot size (R-1=8,800 sf largest among R-series; R-4=5,000 sf smallest). SR-15/SR-12 suburban tier IS lot-size-encoded in thousand-sf. Not INVERSE in the Grand Prairie sense (SF-1 largest, SF-6 smallest is INVERSE); rather a use-type-index where the number is a sequential tier label.

Worth knowing
  • R-1 through R-4 naming is sequential use-type-index with DECREASING minimum lot size (R-1=8,800 sf largest; R-4=5,000 sf smallest). This is NOT Grand-Prairie-style INVERSE; rather, within the SF-series the number is a sequential tier label, not a lot-size encoding. SR-15/SR-12 suburban tier DOES use lot-size-encoded thousand-sf naming (SR-15=15,000 sf). Same UDC mixes two naming conventions across the residential hierarchy.
  • Three place-name mixed-use districts pinned to specific corridors/areas: C-MU (Cullen Boulevard preservation); G/O-MU (Garden Road and O'Day Road preservation); SPD (Spectrum District at Kirby/Spectrum Drive node, implementing 2004 Comp Plan with 5 sub-districts). Plus OT (Old Townsite downtown, three sub-districts). Plus BP-288 (SH-288 corridor). Five distinct corridor/area-specific districts — higher-than-average for a city of 130k.
  • OT-GB (Old Townsite General Business) has NO maximum height — 'Maximum Height: None' is explicit in §2.4.3.4. This is unusual for a downtown overlay and reflects Pearland's adaptive-reuse policy to encourage redevelopment of historic main-street structures.

+ 10 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

res_sf 9mu 4com 3off 2ind 2ag 1res_th 1res_mf 1cbd 1
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
SDSuburban Development Districtag / /
R-ESingle-Family Estate Districtres_sf21,780 sf[4]35 ft[5]0.5[6]40[1] / 10[2] / 25[3]
SR-15Suburban Residential-15res_sf15,000 sf[10]35 ft[11]0.5[12]30[7] / 10[8] / 25[9]
SR-12Suburban Residential-12res_sf12,000 sf[16]35 ft[17]0.6[18]25[13] / 10[14] / 20[15]
R-1Single-Family Residential-1res_sf8,800 sf[22]35 ft[23]0.6[24]25[19] / 7.5[20] / 20[21]
R-2Single-Family Residential-2res_sf7,000 sf[28]35 ft[29]0.6[30]25[25] / 7.5[26] / 20[27]
R-3Single-Family Residential-3res_sf6,000 sf[34]35 ft[35]0.6[36]25[31] / 7.5[32] / 20[33]
R-4Single-Family Residential-4res_sf5,000 sf[40]35 ft[41]0.5[42]25[37] / 7.5[38] / 20[39]
THTownhouse Residential Districtres_th3,000 sf[46]35 ft[47]0.5[48]20[43] / 0[44] / 10[45]
MFMultiple-Family Residential Districtres_mf20,000 sf[52]35 ft[53]0.4[54]16[55]25[49] / 10[50] / 25[51]
MHManufactured Home Park Districtres_sf6,000 sf[59]35 ft[60]0.3[61]5[62]10[56] / 10[57] / 10[58]
SPDSpectrum District (Sub-District S1/S2/S3/S4/S5)mu43,560 sf[66]55[63] / 25[64] / 25[65]
C-MUCullen Mixed-Use Districtmu7,000 sf[70]0.6[71]25[67] / 7.5[68] / 20[69]
G/O-MUGarden/O'Day Mixed-Use Districtmu6,000 sf[75]0.6[76]25[72] / 7.5[73] / 20[74]
OT-GBOld Townsite - General Business (OT-GB)cbd3,000 sf[79]-1 ft[80]0.5[81]0[77] / / 20[78]
OT-ROld Townsite - Residential (OT-R)res_sf3,000 sf[85]35 ft[86]0.5[87]20[82] / 7.5[83] / 20[84]
OT-MUOld Townsite - Mixed Use (OT-MU)mu / /
OPOffice & Professional Districtoff12,500 sf[91]35 ft[92]25[88] / 10[89] / 10[90]
BP-288Business Park District-288off43,560 sf[96]65 ft[97]25[93] / 20[94] / 20[95]
NSNeighborhood Service Districtcom12,500 sf[101]35 ft[102]25[98] / 10[99] / 10[100]
GBGeneral Business Retail Districtcom22,500 sf[106]45 ft[107]25[103] / 10[104] / 25[105]
GCGeneral Commercial Districtcom22,500 sf[111]45 ft[112]25[108] / 10[109] / 25[110]
M-1Light Industrial Districtind40,000 sf[116]45 ft[117]35[113] / 25[114] / 25[115]
M-2Heavy Industrial Districtind40,000 sf[121]60 ft[122]35[118] / 25[119] / 25[120]

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

COD
Corridors Overlay District
COR
UDC Ch.2 Art.4 Div.5 §2.4.5.1 · §2.4.5.1 (Ord. 2000T-2 Feb 26, 2007; Ord. 2000T-16 Dec 16, 2013 latest within captured PDF)

Lot frontage on either side of street ROW along 12 enumerated major thoroughfares: (1) Pearland Parkway, (2) Oiler Drive, (3) McHard Road, (4) SH 35 (except Old Townsite), (5) Broadway Road (except Old Townsite), (6) Magnolia Road/CR 59/Southfork Dr/John Lizer Road (except Old Townsite), (7) Kirby Drive, (8) Dixie Farm Road, (9) Beltway 8, (10) Bailey Avenue, (11) Massey Ranch Road, (12) Cullen Boulevard.

scopeSupplements underlying conventional district with more restrictive standards; COD controls where conflict with base.
building_facade_standardsRequirements apply to any side of structure facing corridor (per §2.4.5.1(d)).
trademark_color_limitCorporate trademark colors as accent only (§2.4.5.1(d)(3))
coordinated_landscaping_requiredPublic entries must bear relationship to landscaping
roads_covered_count12
excludesOld Townsite District carved out of SH 35 / Broadway / Magnolia corridor segments
FO
Floodplain / Flood Damage Prevention Overlay
FP
City of Pearland Code of Ordinances Chapter 78 (Floods) — parallel to UDC; FEMA FIRM adoption · Pearland Code Ch.78 Flood Damage Prevention (not in captured UDC Ch.2 Art.4 PDF; section-level retrieval pending)

FEMA-mapped 100-yr (A-zone) and 500-yr floodplain along Clear Creek, Mary's Creek, Hickory Slough, Cowart Creek, and Brazos River tributary drainages; heavy post-Hurricane Harvey (Aug 2017) SFHA expansion across Brazoria County.

fema_firm_adoptedTrue
freeboard_ft_above_bfepartial — typical post-Harvey Texas coastal-plain cities adopt BFE +1 to +2 ft; Pearland specific freeboard not captured from UDC Ch.2
floodway_encroachment_no_rise_requiredstandard TX/FEMA requirement, not captured from UDC text
basement_prohibited_in_SFHAstandard FEMA NFIP requirement
stormwater_detention_required_new_developmentpost-Harvey stormwater detention standards likely tightened — not captured from Ch.2
OT
Old Townsite Mixed-Use Overlay (historic downtown core)
HP
UDC Ch.2 Art.4 Div.3 §2.4.3.4 · §2.4.3.4 (Ord. 2000T-1 added July 10, 2006; Ord. 2000T-16 Dec 16, 2013)

Old Townsite district boundary along Main Street and Broadway Street (downtown Pearland, pre-1970 historic townsite core). Three sub-districts: OT-GB (General Business), OT-R (Residential), OT-MU (Mixed Use).

purpose_statementPromote walkable pedestrian-friendly downtown, reinforce existing land use patterns, reduced parking ratios, shared parking flexibility, encourage re-use of existing buildings (§2.4.3.4(a)).
OT-GB_min_lot_sf3000
OT-GB_min_lot_width_ft50
OT-GB_max_heightNone (no maximum)
OT-GB_front_setback_from_broadway_or_main_centerline_ft60
OT-GB_front_setback_other_streets_ft25
OT-GB_rear_setback_ft_default20
OT-GB_rear_setback_ft_if_abuts_residential25
OT-GB_rear_setback_ft_if_abuts_alley7.5
OT-R_min_lot_sf3000
OT-R_min_lot_width_ft50
OT-R_front_setback_ft20
OT-R_rear_setback_ft_default20
OT-R_rear_setback_ft_if_alley7.5
parking_reduction_non_res_existing_structures_pct50
parking_stacked_spaces_allowed_for_conversions_up_to_600sfTrue
outdoor_dining_allowed_with_CUP_and_3ft_pedestrian_clearTrue
narrower_lot_grandfather_date2006-07-10 (date of OT ordinance adoption)
AHO
Airport Hazard / Airspace Overlay (federal layer)
AP
FAA 14 CFR Part 77 (federal); Pearland UDC reference pending · 14 CFR Part 77 (federal); local citation not captured from UDC Ch.2 Art.4 (may exist elsewhere in Pearland Code)

Proximity to (1) Pearland Regional Airport (LVJ) — general aviation field directly inside Pearland city limits on west side; (2) Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base (EFD) ~8 mi east; (3) William P. Hobby Airport (HOU) ~12 mi northeast. Part 77 imaginary surfaces project into Pearland airspace from all three facilities. Pearland Regional owner-operated general aviation field with flight school activity and noise contours near west-central city.

part_77_surfaces_adoptedfederal — applies regardless of local codification
pearland_regional_airport_LVJ_coordinates29.5203°N 95.2418°W (approximate)
notice_of_proposed_construction_FAA_7460_1_requiredfor objects penetrating Part 77 surfaces
local_height_cap_ftunder_review — not captured from UDC Ch.2 Art.4; V1 asserted 100 ft but no UDC citation found in captured text
aicuz_ellington_mil_compatibilityEllington Field Joint Reserve Base has AICUZ footprint potentially extending into northeast Pearland; coordination per DoD AICUZ program
HPO
Historic Preservation Overlay
HP
not_found in captured UDC Ch.2 Art.4 text
TOD
Transit-Oriented Development Overlay
TOD
not_found
ENV
Environmental / Wetland Overlay
ENV
not_found in captured UDC Ch.2 Art.4
CBD
Downtown / CBD Overlay (non-OT)
DT
not_found
AH
Affordable Housing Bonus Overlay
AH
not_found

State preemptions

Qualifying condition
Lot-size trigger: lots <= 4,000 sf. Applies statewide to all Texas home-rule cities without population precondition. Pearland is a home-rule city.
Source
TX SB 15 (88th Legislature, 2025); general home-rule applicability.
Effect
Limits city regulation of setbacks, parking, height, and bulk on qualifying lots <=4,000 sf. Directly intersects TH (min lot 3,000 sf) and OT-R / OT-GB (min lot 3,000 sf) — SB 15 caps regulatory reach on setback/parking/height on these small-lot districts. R-4 (min 5,000 sf) is above the threshold but subdivisions producing sub-4,000 sf lots become feasible under SB 15.
TX HB 2127 (Texas Regulatory Consistency Act, 2023)applies
Qualifying condition
Statewide applicability to all Texas home-rule cities including Pearland.
Effect
Preempts local regulation in agriculture, business/commerce, finance, insurance, labor, natural resources, occupations, and property domains where state law occupies the field. Touches zoning-adjacent business-operations ordinances; does not directly preempt dimensional zoning standards.
TX SB 2038 (2023) — ETJ Release Petitionsapplies
Qualifying condition
Pearland is a home-rule city with an ETJ per TX LGC §42.021; SB 2038 permits property owners to petition for release from city ETJ statewide.
Effect
Reduces city ability to retain ETJ jurisdiction against owner-initiated release petitions. Affects subdivision regulation reach outside city limits, not base-district dimensional standards inside city limits.
Non-applicable laws (1)
Qualifying condition
City pop 130,570 (Census Vintage 2023 PEP) < 150,000 threshold. SB 840 requires city pop >= 150,000 AND county pop >= 300,000. Even if Brazoria County population (~385,000 Vintage 2023) clears the county gate, the city-level threshold is not met. Pearland is borderline but below the 150k trigger as of the most recent Census estimate.
Source
US Census Bureau Vintage 2023 Population Estimates Program (PEP), city-level and county-level — verify at Decennial 2030 and subsequent PEP releases as Pearland growth rate could cross 150k within 2-3 years.
Effect
No MF-by-right mandate under SB 840 in Pearland commercial/office/retail/warehouse/MU zones at this time. Local GB/GC/BP-288/M-1 districts retain full land-use authority over MF.

Adopted building codes

Home rule; major cities on 2024 IBC

2021
2021
2023
Local adoption
IECC (Residential)
2015
IECC (Commercial)
2015

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Amendment history

DateKindCitation
2026-04-19retrieved at
2013-12-16last amendedOrd. 2000T-16, Section 2.4.3.3 (latest amendment within captured Article 4 text)
2007-07-09effectiveOrd. 2000T-3, Sections 2.4.2.1-2.4.2.11 (comprehensive UDC adoption)
2006-07-10adoptionOrd. 2000T-1 Section 2.4.3.4 added July 10, 2006 (OT District creation)

Quirks & notes

  • R-1 through R-4 naming is sequential use-type-index with DECREASING minimum lot size (R-1=8,800 sf largest; R-4=5,000 sf smallest). This is NOT Grand-Prairie-style INVERSE; rather, within the SF-series the number is a sequential tier label, not a lot-size encoding. SR-15/SR-12 suburban tier DOES use lot-size-encoded thousand-sf naming (SR-15=15,000 sf). Same UDC mixes two naming conventions across the residential hierarchy.
  • Three place-name mixed-use districts pinned to specific corridors/areas: C-MU (Cullen Boulevard preservation); G/O-MU (Garden Road and O'Day Road preservation); SPD (Spectrum District at Kirby/Spectrum Drive node, implementing 2004 Comp Plan with 5 sub-districts). Plus OT (Old Townsite downtown, three sub-districts). Plus BP-288 (SH-288 corridor). Five distinct corridor/area-specific districts — higher-than-average for a city of 130k.
  • OT-GB (Old Townsite General Business) has NO maximum height — 'Maximum Height: None' is explicit in §2.4.3.4. This is unusual for a downtown overlay and reflects Pearland's adaptive-reuse policy to encourage redevelopment of historic main-street structures.
  • Corridors Overlay (COD) covers 12 enumerated major thoroughfares city-wide — Pearland Parkway, Oiler Dr, McHard Rd, SH 35, Broadway, Magnolia/CR 59/Southfork/John Lizer, Kirby, Dixie Farm, Beltway 8, Bailey Ave, Massey Ranch, Cullen Blvd. OT carves itself out of COD on SH 35/Broadway/Magnolia. This is one of the most extensive corridor-overlay footprints in suburban Texas.
  • MF max 16 du/gross acre — well below the SB 840 36 du/ac floor that would apply if Pearland crossed 150k population. Pearland at 130,570 (Vintage 2023 PEP) is below the SB 840 threshold for now; population growth trajectory puts it within 2-3 years of crossing 150k, after which SB 840 MF-by-right would mandate 36 du/ac and 45 ft height floor on all commercial/office/retail/warehouse/MU parcels. Near-term freshness-auditor watchpoint.
  • R-1, R-2, R-3 side-yard setbacks were reduced from 7.5 ft to 5 ft for lots platted prior to February 27, 2006, with a 15 ft building separation requirement. This is a grandfather provision from the 2006 UDC adoption preserving existing narrow-lot subdivision patterns.
  • Patio-home option within R-4 district requires min 25,000 sf gross site area and 900 sf common open space per dwelling unit. Patio-home configuration is a bulk-level (not lot-level) overlay on R-4.
  • TH townhouse minimum lot is 3,000 sf (same as OT-GB and OT-R); complex length capped at 200 ft or 6 attached units. TH lots are below the TX SB 15 (2025) 4,000 sf threshold — SB 15 now caps city regulation of setbacks, parking, height, and bulk on these small lots.
  • Multi-county straddle: Pearland is primarily in Brazoria County (~400k pop) but extends into Harris County (~4.7M) and a small portion into Fort Bend County. County population input to TX SB 840 evaluation uses Brazoria as primary county.
  • Hurricane Harvey (Aug 2017) significantly flooded Pearland; post-Harvey stormwater detention and freeboard standards likely tightened in Code Ch.78 (Flood Damage Prevention) — parameters not captured in UDC Ch.2 Art.4 extract.
  • SH 288 toll-lane addition (2020) accelerated BP-288 corridor development. The BP-288 district is uniquely tied to a single state highway corridor (65 ft height, 1-acre minimum lot, 50k-sf articulation threshold).
  • Pearland Regional Airport (LVJ) is inside city limits on the west side — general aviation field with Part 77 imaginary surfaces over west-central Pearland; Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base 8 miles east with AICUZ footprint. Federal Part 77 / AICUZ layers supersede local height maxima where applicable.
  • V1 profile (2026-04-08) used fabricated district codes (SF-5/SF-7/SF-10/SF-12, MF-8/12/18, C-1/C-2/C-3, M-1/M-2) copy-pasted from a generic Texas template with uniform 5000/35/.50/.50/25/25/10 placeholder values. Only M-1 and M-2 codes match reality; all SF-# and MF-# and C-# codes were phantom. V2 rebuilds from primary source with 22 real districts (SD, R-E, SR-15, SR-12, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, TH, MF, MH, SPD, C-MU, G/O-MU, OT-GB, OT-R, OT-MU, OP, BP-288, NS, GB, GC, M-1, M-2).

Formulas

Definitions

height
Grade to highest point of structure (UDC Chapter 5 Definitions).
lot_coverage
Building footprint / lot area. Some districts use 'Maximum Project Coverage' which applies to the project site rather than individual lots.
far
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre (MF: 16 du/gross ac; MH: 5 du/gross ac).
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face; measured per Ch.2 Art.4.
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face.
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face; increased to 30' adjacent to thoroughfare/collector without landscape reserve.
parking
Per UDC Chapter 2 Article 5 Division 2 and Chapter 4 Article 2 Division 1 (parking standards not captured per-district in Article 4 text).

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2
buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft
max_units_from_density
site_area_ac * du_ac (for MF / MH only)

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

Sort by
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
ft
Floor area ratio
Lot coverage
%
Setbacks (F / S / R)
ft
Parking
/unit
Max density
du/ac
Min lot size
sf
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
city-hosted · Chapter 2 (Zoning Regulations); Article 4 (Zoning Districts); Divisions 1-5 · Ord. 2000T (original 2006) with amendments 2000T-1 through 2000T-16 (latest amendment text captured: 2000T-16 adopted Dec 16, 2013) · retrieved 2026-04-19

Primary source is the city-hosted PDF at gis.pearlandtx.gov/ZoningCodes.pdf (captured Chapter 2 / Article 4 only — the UDC zoning chapter; 70 pages, 178k chars extracted). Municode library is available but is a JS SPA (known blocker) and serves as secondary canonical navigation only. UDC has multiple separate chapters (Ch.1 General Provisions; Ch.2 Zoning Regulations; Ch.3 Subdivision; Ch.4 Site Development; Ch.5 Definitions); this profile extracts Ch.2/Art.4 only. Ordinance amendments appear up to 2013 in the captured PDF; more recent amendments likely exist on Municode and are a freshness-auditor follow-up. Code body uses doubled-letter stylized headings (PDF rendering artifact).

Citations
  1. [1] §2.4.2.2
  2. [2] §2.4.2.2
  3. [3] §2.4.2.2
  4. [4] §2.4.2.2
  5. [5] §2.4.2.2
  6. [6] §2.4.2.2
  7. [7] §2.4.2.3
  8. [8] §2.4.2.3
  9. [9] §2.4.2.3
  10. [10] §2.4.2.3
  11. [11] §2.4.2.3
  12. [12] §2.4.2.3
  13. [13] §2.4.2.4
  14. [14] §2.4.2.4
  15. [15] §2.4.2.4
  16. [16] §2.4.2.4
  17. [17] §2.4.2.4
  18. [18] §2.4.2.4
  19. [19] §2.4.2.5
  20. [20] §2.4.2.5
  21. [21] §2.4.2.5
  22. [22] §2.4.2.5
  23. [23] §2.4.2.5
  24. [24] §2.4.2.5
  25. [25] §2.4.2.6
  26. [26] §2.4.2.6
  27. [27] §2.4.2.6
  28. [28] §2.4.2.6
  29. [29] §2.4.2.6
  30. [30] §2.4.2.6
  31. [31] §2.4.2.7
  32. [32] §2.4.2.7
  33. [33] §2.4.2.7
  34. [34] §2.4.2.7
  35. [35] §2.4.2.7
  36. [36] §2.4.2.7
  37. [37] §2.4.2.8
  38. [38] §2.4.2.8
  39. [39] §2.4.2.8
  40. [40] §2.4.2.8
  41. [41] §2.4.2.8
  42. [42] §2.4.2.8
  43. [43] §2.4.2.9
  44. [44] §2.4.2.9
  45. [45] §2.4.2.9
  46. [46] §2.4.2.9
  47. [47] §2.4.2.9
  48. [48] §2.4.2.9
  49. [49] §2.4.2.10
  50. [50] §2.4.2.10
  51. [51] §2.4.2.10
  52. [52] §2.4.2.10
  53. [53] §2.4.2.10
  54. [54] §2.4.2.10
  55. [55] §2.4.2.10
  56. [56] §2.4.2.11
  57. [57] §2.4.2.11
  58. [58] §2.4.2.11
  59. [59] §2.4.2.11
  60. [60] §2.4.2.11
  61. [61] §2.4.2.11
  62. [62] §2.4.2.11
  63. [63] §2.4.3.1
  64. [64] §2.4.3.1
  65. [65] §2.4.3.1
  66. [66] §2.4.3.1
  67. [67] §2.4.3.2
  68. [68] §2.4.3.2
  69. [69] §2.4.3.2
  70. [70] §2.4.3.2
  71. [71] §2.4.3.2
  72. [72] §2.4.3.3
  73. [73] §2.4.3.3
  74. [74] §2.4.3.3
  75. [75] §2.4.3.3
  76. [76] §2.4.3.3
  77. [77] §2.4.3.4
  78. [78] §2.4.3.4
  79. [79] §2.4.3.4
  80. [80] §2.4.3.4
  81. [81] §2.4.3.4
  82. [82] §2.4.3.4
  83. [83] §2.4.3.4
  84. [84] §2.4.3.4
  85. [85] §2.4.3.4
  86. [86] §2.4.3.4
  87. [87] §2.4.3.4
  88. [88] §2.4.4.2
  89. [89] §2.4.4.2
  90. [90] §2.4.4.2
  91. [91] §2.4.4.2
  92. [92] §2.4.4.2
  93. [93] §2.4.4.3
  94. [94] §2.4.4.3
  95. [95] §2.4.4.3
  96. [96] §2.4.4.3
  97. [97] §2.4.4.3
  98. [98] §2.4.4.4
  99. [99] §2.4.4.4
  100. [100] §2.4.4.4
  101. [101] §2.4.4.4
  102. [102] §2.4.4.4
  103. [103] §2.4.4.5
  104. [104] §2.4.4.5
  105. [105] §2.4.4.5
  106. [106] §2.4.4.5
  107. [107] §2.4.4.5
  108. [108] §2.4.4.6
  109. [109] §2.4.4.6
  110. [110] §2.4.4.6
  111. [111] §2.4.4.6
  112. [112] §2.4.4.6
  113. [113] §2.4.4.7
  114. [114] §2.4.4.7
  115. [115] §2.4.4.7
  116. [116] §2.4.4.7
  117. [117] §2.4.4.7
  118. [118] §2.4.4.8
  119. [119] §2.4.4.8
  120. [120] §2.4.4.8
  121. [121] §2.4.4.8
  122. [122] §2.4.4.8

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassedhttps://gis.pearlandtx.gov/ZoningCodes.pdf (city-hosted PDF; non-aggregator)
no aggregator citedpassedscan clean — only pearlandtx.gov, municode.com (secondary), capitol.texas.gov
confidence tags full formpassed130 confirmed fields carry §-citation in the form c§2.4.x.y referencing UDC Ch.2 Art.4 sections
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassedCOD and OT confirmed with full params+trigger+citation; FO and AHO marked partial with paired retrieval_failure_reason; HPO, TOD, ENV, AH marked not_found with search_performed documented; CBD marked not_applicable with reason
preempt section city specificpassed4 state preemption entries with city-specific qualifying_condition_checked (SB 840 does_not_apply based on pop 130,570<150,000 arithmetic; SB 15 applies on lot-size trigger; HB 2127 and SB 2038 applies statewide)

Data quality

78%completeness130 confirmed12 partial5 not found
Documented gaps
  • Flood Damage Prevention Ch.78 (parallel chapter to UDC Ch.2) — freeboard height above BFE, stormwater detention requirements, post-Harvey amendments not captured from UDC text. FO overlay parameters marked partial.
  • OT-MU (Old Townsite Mixed-Use sub-district) dimensional standards not fully extracted from captured Ch.2 Art.4 text — likely cross-references OT-GB and OT-R; under review.
  • SPD (Spectrum District) sub-district-specific standards for S1-S5 beyond the shared 1-acre-min / 20-55 ft setback framework — deferred.
  • Land Use Matrix (UDC Ch.2 Art.5 Div.2) — permitted/conditional uses per district not extracted into this profile beyond summary prose.
  • Parking standards (UDC Ch.2 Art.5 Div.2 and Ch.4 Art.2 Div.1) — per-district parking ratios not captured; parking fields mostly null as a result.
  • Airport Hazard Overlay (AHO) local codification section — V1 asserted 100 ft local height cap but no citation found in Ch.2 Art.4; AHO marked partial pending Ch.78 or Ch.4 retrieval.
  • Newer amendments post-2013-12-16 (if any) — captured PDF may lag Municode supplement; freshness-auditor follow-up.

Known issues

data:gaps-present

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.