St. Louis, MO Zoning

12 districts. 6 overlays.
This profile is an earlier edition — some fields may be incomplete. An updated profile is in progress.

Overview

Worth knowing
  • St. Louis is an independent city, separated from St. Louis County by constitutional provision (1876). This unique status means zoning authority is not derived from county delegation.
  • Cumulative zoning system: Districts A through L form a pyramid where each district permits all uses from lower districts. This creates complex overlapping use permissions.
  • Setbacks are measured from building line (existing or proposed buildings on same street side) rather than lot line in specified cases.

+ 7 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

res_mf 4spec 2com 2ind 2res_sf 2
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
ADistrict Aspec / /
BDistrict Bspec / /
CDistrict Ccom / /
DDistrict Dcom / /
EDistrict Eind / /
FDistrict Find / /
GDistrict Gres_mf / /
HDistrict Hres_mf / /
IDistrict Ires_mf / /
JDistrict Jres_mf / /
KDistrict Kres_sf / /
LDistrict Lres_sf / /

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

CUP
Community Unit Plan
PD
Title 26 § 26.115

Applicant-initiated overlay for planned development on any base district

scopeMixed-use development with flexible lot and setback standards, subject to plan approval
PUD
Planned Unit Development
PD
Title 26 § 26.120

Applicant-initiated overlay for planned development

scopeResidential, mixed-use, or commercial development with modified standards
SUD
Special Use District
SPD
Title 26 § 26.125

Specific geographic areas designated for specialized development control

scopeTargeted redevelopment or conservation areas
FBD
Form-Based District
COR
Title 26 §§ 26.130–26.145

Corridors and neighborhoods where form-based regulations apply

scopeBuild-to-line, facade standards, use configurations based on urban form rather than use separation
noteSpecific FBD corridors not fully enumerated in available sources
SPO
Signage Plan Overlay
COR
Title 26 § 26.150

Specified corridors and commercial areas

scopeSign size, type, placement, and lighting standards
FP
Floodplain Overlay
FP
Title 26 § 26.090

FEMA-mapped floodplain zones within city

fema_zonesA; AE; X
development_standardsElevation, fill, structure type, and use restrictions per FEMA and local amendments

Adopted building codes

Local adoption

Local adoption
2018
2017
Local
IECC (Residential)
Local
IECC (Commercial)
Local

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

  • St. Louis is an independent city, separated from St. Louis County by constitutional provision (1876). This unique status means zoning authority is not derived from county delegation.
  • Cumulative zoning system: Districts A through L form a pyramid where each district permits all uses from lower districts. This creates complex overlapping use permissions.
  • Setbacks are measured from building line (existing or proposed buildings on same street side) rather than lot line in specified cases.
  • PlanSTL neighborhood initiative (2024-2026) may influence future district reorganizations and form-based standards.
  • ZOUP code overhaul currently in draft stage with anticipated completion mid-July 2026; adoption timeline uncertain and may delay any comprehensive code revision.
  • Ordinance 72027 amended residential lot area minimums but specific new minimums not extracted from available sources.
  • Historic districts are administered by the Preservation Board through design review and Certificate of Appropriateness, not as separate zoning overlays.
  • Height limits by specific district not extracted from available sources; sources typically reference footnotes in Title 26 dimensional tables.
  • Parking minimums by use type not extracted; requires direct reference to Title 26 §26.40–26.80 use-specific standards.
  • Form-Based District corridors identified in code but specific street segments or neighborhoods not fully enumerated.

Formulas

Definitions

cumulative_hierarchy
St. Louis uses cumulative zoning system where Districts A through L form a pyramid. Each district permits all uses allowed in lower districts. A (least restrictive) through L (most restrictive residential).
setback_by_building_line
Where required, setbacks measured from the line of existing or proposed buildings on the same side of street rather than from lot line.
j_district_residential_frontage
J district requires 40% of street frontage to have residential use to maintain zoning intent.

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

Sort by
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
ft
Floor area ratio
Lot coverage
%
Setbacks (F / S / R)
ft
Parking
/unit
Max density
du/ac
Min lot size
sf
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Research status

Data quality

35%completeness12 confirmed6 partial
Documented gaps
  • Dimensional standards (lot area minimums, height limits, setbacks, coverage ratios, FAR, parking ratios) for all 12 base districts not extracted from source tables §26.12–26.60
  • Specific corridors designated as Form-Based Districts not enumerated
  • Active CUP and PUD overlay list not available in open sources
  • Density bonuses and use permissions under CUP/PUD not detailed
  • Specific FEMA floodplain zones and elevation standards not extracted
  • Approval process timelines and variance procedures not documented
  • Current City GIS maps and zoning map not accessed

Known issues

schema:v1-legacypriority:lowdata:gaps-present

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.