Zoning › Florida › Santa Rosa County › Navarre

Navarre, FL Zoning

No-zoning-zoning. 11 districts · 5 overlays · 6 applicable state preemptions.

Overview

Code type
no-zoning
Naming convention
n/a

Navarre is NOT an incorporated municipality. It is an unincorporated Census Designated Place (CDP) in Santa Rosa County, Florida. Land use is administered by Santa Rosa County via the LDC under Fla. Stat. Ch. 125 (county home rule) and Ch. 163 (comp-plan consistency). The LDC does, however, codify a dedicated suite of NB-prefix districts (Navarre Beach Single Family NB-SF, Medium High Density NB-MHD, Medium Density NB-MD, High Density NB-HD, Commercial NB-C, Hotel NB-H, Planned Mixed Use Development NB-PMUD, Conservation/Recreation NB-Con/Rec, and Utilities NB-U) per LDC §2.02.01. The Navarre Beach peninsula is a leasehold parcel (Santa Rosa County leases the peninsula from Escambia County, originating from the 1949 Florida legislative grant — Laws of Florida 1949, Ch. 24500). The LDC §4.02.09 explicitly conditions all Navarre Beach development on the relevant lease agreement between the leaseholder and Santa Rosa County. base_districts[] is intentionally empty because Navarre itself has no city-scoped districts; county districts applying to Navarre parcels are captured in districts[] with source_jurisdiction='santa-rosa-county-fl'.

Worth knowing

+ 6 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

res_mf 3res_sf 2com 2mu 2res_mu 1ind 1
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
NB-SFNavarre Beach Single Family (NB-SF)res_sf—[4]35 ft[5]—[6]—[7]1[8]2[9]25[1] / 7.5[2] / 15[3]
NB-MHDNavarre Beach Medium High Density (NB-MHD)res_mu—[13]—[14]—[15]—[16]4[17]2[18]25[10] / 7.5[11] / 15[12]
NB-MDNavarre Beach Medium Density Residential (NB-MD)res_mf—[22]—[23]0.25[24]—[25]10[26]2[27]30[19] / 15[20] / —[21]
NB-HDNavarre Beach High Density Residential (NB-HD) — Commercial Core onlyres_mf—[31]—[32]0.25[33]—[34]30[35]2[36]30[28] / 15[29] / —[30]
NB-CNavarre Beach Commercial (NB-C)com—[40]—[41]0.25[42]—[43]30[44]2[45]25[37] / —[38] / 25[39]
NB-HNavarre Beach Hotel (NB-H)mu—[49]—[50]—[51]—[52]—[53]2[54]25[46] / —[47] / 25[48]
NB-PMUDNavarre Beach Planned Mixed Use Development (NB-PMUD) — Commercial Core onlymu—[58]—[59]—[60]—[61]30[62]2[63]30[55] / 15[56] / —[57]
R-1Single Family Residential (R-1) — Mainland Navarreres_sf10,890 sf[67]35 ft[68]—[69]—[70]4[71]2[72]25[64] / —[65] / 25[66]
R-2Medium Density Residential (R-2) — Mainland Navarreres_mf4,000 sf[76]45 ft[77]—[78]—[79]10[80]2[81]20[73] / —[74] / 10[75]
HCDHighway Commercial Development (HCD) — Mainland Navarre US-98 Corridorcom—[85]50 ft[86]—[87]—[88]10[89]2[90]50[82] / 5[83] / 25[84]
M-1Restricted Industrial (M-1) — Mainland Navarreind—[94]50 ft[95]—[96]—[97]—[98]2[99]50[91] / 5[92] / 25[93]

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

NB-CCA
Navarre Beach Commercial Core Area Overlay
SPEC
Santa Rosa County LDC §7.07.02 (Commercial Core Area) and §2.02.02.F (overlay establishment); cross-referenced in Tables 2.04.02.b and 2.05.01.b density/height footnotes · c§7.07.02-SRC-LDC; c§2.04.02-SRC-LDC; c§2.05.01-SRC-LDC; c§2.02.02.F-SRC-LDC
NB-PDS
Navarre Beach Peninsula Development Standards (LDC §4.02.09)
SPEC
Santa Rosa County LDC §4.02.09 — codifies peninsula-wide development conditions distinct from mainland LDC standards · c§4.02.09-SRC-LDC; c§4.02.10-SRC-LDC; c§4.06.03-SRC-LDC; c§2.05.02-SRC-LDC; c§2.05.04-SRC-LDC
EAFB-MAZ
Eglin AFB Military Airport Zone (EAFB MAZ) Overlay
MIL
Santa Rosa County LDC Chapter 8 §8.03.00 (Military Airport Zones and Surfaces); enforced via FAA 14 CFR Part 77, DoD Instruction 4165.57, 32 CFR Part 256, and Fla. Admin. Code 28-42 · c§8.03.00-SRC-LDC; c§8.03.01-SRC-LDC; c§8.03.02-SRC-LDC; c§8.03.03-SRC-LDC; cTable-8-3-SRC-LDC; cTable-8-4-SRC-LDC; c14-CFR-77; cDoD-Instruction-4165.57; c32-CFR-256; cFAC-28-42
MAZ-OTHER
Hurlburt Field AICUZ / NAS Whiting Field MAZ Overlay
MIL
Hurlburt Field AICUZ Study under DoD Instruction 4165.57 and 32 CFR Part 256; NAS Whiting Field North/South AICUZ; applied locally via Santa Rosa County LDC §8.03.01.G with NAS Whiting MAZ extending 0.5 mile from each airfield perimeter and encompassing all AICUZ noise zones · c§8.03.01-SRC-LDC; cAICUZ§32-CFR-256; c14-CFR-77; cDoD-Instruction-4165.57; pHurlburt-Field-AICUZ-Study
CHHA-CCCL
Coastal High Hazard Area + CCCL + LDC Floodplain Overlay
ENV
Santa Rosa County LDC Chapter 3 §3.02.00 (Floodplain Management Ordinance, basis = FIS for Santa Rosa County dated November 19, 2021 plus FIRM panels) and §3.05.00 (Coastal Management/Conservation); Santa Rosa County 2040 Comp Plan Coastal Management Element under Fla. Stat. §163.3178; FL DEP Coastal Construction Control Line under Fla. Stat. §161.053; FEMA NFIP VE/AE zones administered under 44 CFR Part 60 · c§3.02.00-SRC-LDC; c§3.02.07-SRC-LDC; c§3.05.00-SRC-LDC; c§161.053-Fla-Stat-CCCL; c§163.3178-Fla-Stat-CHHA; c44-CFR-60-FEMA-NFIP; cFIS-Santa-Rosa-2021-11-19

State preemptions

FL-Live-Local-Act-SB102-SB328-SB1730applies
Qualifying condition
Navarre is not a municipality — it is an unincorporated CDP. Population of the Navarre CDP ~45,346 (US Census 2020) is a market-context data point but is NOT a qualifying-threshold input because Live Local applies to all Florida counties (and municipalities) regardless of population. Jurisdiction of application for Navarre parcels is Santa Rosa County (pop 198,003 per Census 2022 PEP), so the operative citation is Fla. Stat. §125.01055(7) (counties), which parallels §166.04151(7) (municipalities). Per-parcel trigger: site within Santa Rosa County's LDC HCD / NC / TC-1 / NB-C / NB-H / mixed-use NB-PMUD / M-1 / M-2 (and the LDC's commercial-and-industrial Future Land Use equivalents) AND ≥40% units affordable at or below 120% AMI. Navarre-specific: mainland Navarre HCD corridor along US-98 / Gulf Breeze Pkwy, R-2 multifamily mainland parcels, and any Future Land Use designation MU substrate are eligible. v1 record erroneously cited c§380.06(19) — that is the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) statute, NOT Live Local. v3 confirms c§125.01055(7) as the operative county citation.
Effect
By-right multifamily at ≥40% affordability. Density floor = highest residential density allowed anywhere in Santa Rosa County's LDC (the highest published residential cap in LDC Table 2.04.02.a is NB-HD at 30 du/ac inside the Commercial Core Area, and NB-PMUD at 30 du/ac; Table 2.04.02.b also caps NB-C inside Commercial Core at 30 du/ac. Off-peninsula, R-3 at 18 du/ac is the highest mainland residential cap. Per Santa Rosa County 2040 Comprehensive Plan FLUM, the highest-density Future Land Use category is the operative LLA reference). Height floor = tallest of (a) highest zoning height within 1 mile, OR (b) tallest existing adjacent building. Mandatory ≥20% parking reduction per SB 328 (2024). Hotel/motel conversion pathway per SB 328. SB 1730 (2025) Home Rule clarifier limits county administrative-review discretion and tightens the objective-building-code test.
FL-Private-Property-Rights-Actapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide application to all FL local governments including counties. Applies to Santa Rosa County regulatory actions affecting parcels in Navarre. Navarre-specific exposure: Navarre Beach peninsula leasehold parcels, pre-subdivision mainland platted lots from the 1960s-70s Gulf-coast boom era, and CHHA-constrained parcels where development expectation pre-dates hazard mapping.
Effect
County must conduct property-owner notice and inordinate-burden review before adopting LDC amendments that materially restrict established property rights. Creates procedural check on new amendments to LDC §4.02.09 or §7.07.02 that would downzone peninsula parcels, or new MAZ coordination restrictions on mainland parcels.
FL-Bert-Harris-Actapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Navarre-specific: AICUZ-constrained parcels (where development expectation pre-dates AICUZ mapping), pre-platted mainland subdivisions, and Navarre Beach peninsula leasehold parcels with pre-existing resort entitlements. Hurricane Ivan (2004), Dennis (2005), and Sally (2020) post-storm regulatory tightening creates Bert Harris exposure for parcels where reconstruction rights were curtailed.
Effect
Property owners may claim compensation for regulations that inordinately burden real property. Santa Rosa County must conduct inordinate-burden review before adopting new overlays or downzoning.
FL-STR-Preemptionapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Materially consequential for Navarre given the Navarre Beach vacation-rental economy (Emerald Coast tourism zone). No pre-2011 Santa Rosa County STR-specific ordinance of record identified that would grandfather under the statute's pre-2011 carve-out for Navarre parcels.
Effect
County cannot prohibit vacation rentals in any residential district, cannot regulate frequency or duration of rentals. Permitted: registration, life-safety inspection, taxation, noise/parking enforcement of general applicability. Navarre Beach peninsula resort economy relies heavily on this preemption.
FL-Impact-Fee-Caps-HB7103-HB337applies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Material to Santa Rosa County given post-Hurricane-Sally infrastructure pressure and Navarre-area growth driven by Eglin/Hurlburt/Whiting military workforce housing demand. County impact fees for transportation, schools, parks, law enforcement all constrained.
Effect
Impact fee increases capped at 12.5%/yr / 25% over 2 yrs / 50% over 4 yrs without extraordinary-circumstance finding + independent study. Requires public workshops.
FL-Building-Code-Preemptionapplies
Qualifying condition
Statewide. Navarre is within the FBC Wind-Borne Debris Region (but NOT High-Velocity Hurricane Zone — HVHZ is Miami-Dade/Broward). Significant post-Sally (2020) reconstruction activity subject to FBC. CCCL-seaward construction additionally subject to Fla. Stat. §161.053 state standards which stack with FBC. LDC §3.02.04 and §3.02.07.F expressly provide that the Floodplain Management Ordinance is administered in conjunction with FBC and the more restrictive of the two governs.
Effect
Local technical amendments to FBC limited; structural/wind/energy minima track FBC 2023 (8th edition) + ASCE 7-22. Santa Rosa County cannot impose alternative structural codes.

Adopted building codes

Statewide — FL Building Code 7th ed

IBC
2021 FBC
IRC
2021 FBC
NEC
2020
IFC
2021
IECC (Residential)
2021
IECC (Commercial)
2021

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

Formulas

Definitions

height
Grade to highest point of structure per Santa Rosa County LDC §2.05.00; on Navarre Beach measured in habitable stories per Table 2.05.01.a (NB-HD) and Table 2.05.01.b (NB-C, NB-H); CCCL-regulated portions of the peninsula additionally measured from the DEP CCCL datum; LDC §8.03.00 imposes 14 CFR Part 77 imaginary surface limits on parcels within Eglin AFB MAZ / NAS Whiting MAZ.
lot_coverage
Maximum Building Footprint percent per LDC Table 2.04.02.a/b — for NB-MD parcels capped at 25%; for NB-HD parcels stepped 25% (1-4 story) / 23% (5-7 story) / 21% (8-9 story) / 19% (over 9 story); for NB-C Commercial Core 25%/23%/21%/19% by story bands; not specified for most mainland districts (controlled via setback + height + lot size).
far
FAR not generally published per residential district in the LDC; intensity primarily controlled via lot-coverage + height + setback + lot-size. PUD/PBD/PID intensity caps apply (LDC §2.04.02.B.3 = 0.75 FAR aggregate non-residential within PUD). LDC §8.03.00 imposes APZ-1 / APZ-2 FAR caps for specific use categories (Wholesale Trade 0.28 APZ-1 / 0.56 APZ-2; Auto/Marine/Aviation Retail 0.14 / 0.28; Lumber 0.20 / 0.40; Hardware/paint 0.12 / 0.24).
du_ac
Dwelling units per gross acre per LDC Table 2.04.02.a — explicit caps: AG-RR 1, AG-1 1/5ac, AG-2 1/15ac, RR-1 2, R-1 4, R-1M 4, R-1A 6, R-2 10, R-2M 10, R-3 18, HR-1 4, HR-2 8, NB-SF 1 per platted lot, NB-MHD 0-4 per platted lot, NB-MD 10, NB-HD 30. Commercial-residential per Table 2.04.02.b — NC 10, HCD 10, TC-1 10, HC-1 8, NB-C 30 inside Commercial Core / 18 outside, C2M 4. NB-PMUD 30 (Commercial Core only).
setback_front
Front property line to nearest building face per LDC Table 2.05.01.a/b — explicit values vary by district (mainland AG-RR/AG-1/AG-2 45'; RR-1/R-1/R-1M/R-1A 25'-20' or 35' on residential collector; R-2/R-2M/R-3 perimeter 25'; NB-SF canal 20' / interior 25' / gulf 30'; NB-MHD 20-30' by lot type; NB-MD 30'; NB-HD 30'; NB-C 25'; NB-H 25'; HC-1 10'; M-1/M-2 50'; PIT 100'). CCCL adds a seaward setback measured from DEP-surveyed line.
setback_side
Side property line to nearest building face per LDC Table 2.05.01.a/b — residential mainland AG/RR/R districts 10% lot width with cap of 15' or 7' for 70-90' lots; NB-SF/NB-MHD canal 7.5' / interior 7.5' / gulf 10'; NB-MD/NB-HD 15' (10% lot width if non-single-family). Commercial NB-C 10% lot, NB-H 10% lot. Mainland C/M side 5' default with 25' adjacent residential.
setback_rear
Rear property line to nearest building face per LDC Table 2.05.01.a/b — most mainland residential 25', R-1A and multifamily 10', R-3 10', HR 3'; NB-SF/NB-MHD canal 15' / interior 15' / gulf 15' / sound 50'; NB-MD/NB-HD 10% lot depth. Commercial NB-C 25', NB-H 25', HC-1 3'.
parking
Per LDC §4.06.02 mainland and §4.06.03 Navarre Beach. Mainland multifamily 2 spaces/unit, 1-bedroom duplex 1.5/unit, drive-up window 6 stacking spaces. Navarre Beach NB-SF 2 spaces/unit; NB-MHD/NB-MD/NB-HD/NB-C residential 1.5 (1 BR) / 2 (2 BR) / 2.5 (3+ BR) per unit. Shoreline protection setbacks 50' apply Gulf and Sound for all districts.

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage_from_ldc_district (Master Plan / Commercial Core reduction by story band on NB-HD, NB-MD, NB-C parcels per Table 2.04.02.a/b)
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far_from_ldc_district (where published — primarily PUD/PBD/PID and AICUZ APZ-restricted use categories)
buildable_width_ft
lot_width_ft - setback_side_ft * 2
buildable_depth_ft
lot_depth_ft - setback_front_ft - setback_rear_ft
max_stories_approx
for NB-HD Commercial Core = 16 habitable + 1 parking; outside Commercial Core for NB-HD = 3 habitable + 1 parking per Table 2.05.01.a; subject to LDC §8.03.00 MAZ/APZ override where mapped (35' SFR cap; multifamily prohibited in Clear Zone / APZ-1 / APZ-2 / MAZ per Table 8-3)

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

—
—
Sort by —
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
— ft
——
Floor area ratio
—
——
Lot coverage
—%
——
Setbacks (F / S / R)
— ft
——
Parking
— /unit
——
Max density
— du/ac
——
Min lot size
— sf
——
◄
prev
►
next
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Primary source
Santa Rosa County Land Development Code
Planning and Zoning Department revision 2025-11-10 · retrieved 2026-04-25

Wave-6 upgrade: bypassed municode SPA by retrieving the canonical LDC PDF directly from the county DocumentCenter (santarosa.fl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5820). curl with Mozilla UA returned a 7.2 MB PDF (PDF v1.6, 21,688 lines extracted via pdftotext -layout). Same path used for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan policy document (DocumentCenter/View/228). Section-numbered tables 2.04.02.a/b/c, 2.05.01.a/b/c, 2.06.01.a/b/c verified directly. Navarre Beach overlay text §4.02.09 and Commercial Core overlay §7.07.02 verified. Military Airport Zone framework §8.03.00 verified including Table 8-3 height restrictions and EAFB MAZ boundary clause.

Secondary sources
Citations
  1. [1] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  2. [2] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  3. [3] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  4. [4] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC
  5. [5] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  6. [6] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  7. [7] iSRC-LDC
  8. [8] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  9. [9] §4.06.03-SRC-LDC
  10. [10] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  11. [11] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  12. [12] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  13. [13] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC
  14. [14] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  15. [15] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  16. [16] iSRC-LDC
  17. [17] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  18. [18] §4.06.03-SRC-LDC
  19. [19] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  20. [20] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  21. [21] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  22. [22] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC
  23. [23] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  24. [24] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  25. [25] iSRC-LDC
  26. [26] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  27. [27] §4.06.03-SRC-LDC
  28. [28] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  29. [29] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  30. [30] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  31. [31] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC
  32. [32] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  33. [33] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  34. [34] iSRC-LDC
  35. [35] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  36. [36] §4.06.03-SRC-LDC
  37. [37] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  38. [38] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  39. [39] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  40. [40] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC
  41. [41] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  42. [42] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  43. [43] iSRC-LDC
  44. [44] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  45. [45] §4.06.03-SRC-LDC
  46. [46] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  47. [47] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  48. [48] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  49. [49] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC
  50. [50] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  51. [51] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  52. [52] iSRC-LDC
  53. [53] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  54. [54] §4.06.03-SRC-LDC
  55. [55] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-c
  56. [56] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-c
  57. [57] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-c
  58. [58] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC
  59. [59] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-c
  60. [60] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-c
  61. [61] iSRC-LDC
  62. [62] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-c
  63. [63] §4.06.03-SRC-LDC
  64. [64] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  65. [65] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  66. [66] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  67. [67] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  68. [68] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  69. [69] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  70. [70] iSRC-LDC
  71. [71] §2.02.04.B-SRC-LDC
  72. [72] §4.06.02-SRC-LDC
  73. [73] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  74. [74] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  75. [75] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  76. [76] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  77. [77] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  78. [78] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-a
  79. [79] iSRC-LDC
  80. [80] §2.02.04.B-SRC-LDC
  81. [81] §4.06.02-SRC-LDC
  82. [82] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  83. [83] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  84. [84] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  85. [85] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  86. [86] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  87. [87] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  88. [88] iSRC-LDC
  89. [89] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  90. [90] §4.06.02-SRC-LDC
  91. [91] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  92. [92] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  93. [93] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  94. [94] §2.06.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  95. [95] §2.05.01-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  96. [96] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  97. [97] iSRC-LDC
  98. [98] §2.04.02-SRC-LDC-Table-b
  99. [99] §4.06.02-SRC-LDC

Research status

Publication gates

primary url presentpassed
no aggregator citedpassed
confidence tags full formpassed
overlays have parameters trigger confidencepassed
preempt section city specificpassed

Data quality

78%completeness47 confirmed4 partial6 inferred2 not found
Documented gaps
  • Hurlburt Field AICUZ contour polygon over Navarre parcels not retrieved at the GIS-layer level — qualitative confirmation only via LDC §8.03.01 and known geography
  • Eglin AFB current AICUZ Study revision date and per-parcel contour mapping not captured at the layer level; LDC text confirms framework
  • FEMA FIRM panel effective date confirmed as 2021-11-19 (FIS) but specific FIRM panel numbers for Navarre Beach not enumerated
  • Santa Rosa County Future Land Use Map highest-density category cell (the Live Local density-floor reference) — comp plan retrieved but FLUM raster identification deferred
  • Specific Maximum Building Footprint percentages for several NB-prefix districts (NB-SF, NB-MHD, NB-H, NB-PMUD) — Table 2.04.02 a/b/c shows blanks for those rows; intensity controlled via setback + height + lot size for those districts

Verification

last_verified_at2026-04-25T00:00:00Z
verifier_specialistverification-pass
verifier_version1.0
verification_resultpassed
atomic_claims_checked52
atomic_claims_passed52
atomic_claims_failed0
failed_claims
verification_notesv3 atomic claims verified directly against the LDC PDF text: (1) NB-prefix district codification at §2.02.01; (2) NB-MD 10 du/ac at Table 2.04.02.a; (3) NB-HD 30 du/ac inside Commercial Core at Table 2.04.02.a and §2.02.04.B; (4) NB-C 30/18 du/ac inside/outside Core at Table 2.04.02.b; (5) NB-C/NB-H 16+1 inside Core / 4+1 or 12+1 outside Core at Table 2.05.01.b notes ***** and ******; (6) Commercial Core Area boundary at §7.07.02 verbatim; (7) §4.02.09 peninsula standards (lease consistency, no mobile homes, sidewalks, 20% landscaped open space); (8) §8.03.01.G EAFB MAZ + NAS Whiting MAZ + NOLF MAZ definitions; (9) Table 8-3 height restrictions for SFR/multifamily/non-residential by zone; (10) §3.02.07.C FIS effective date 2021-11-19; (11) Table 2.05.01.a/b/c 50' shoreline-protection setback for Gulf/Sound/Bays.
narrative_refnarratives/navarre-fl/navarre-2026-04-25-v3.json

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.

Cape CoralDeFuniak SpringsFort LauderdaleFort Walton BeachHialeahJacksonvilleLehigh AcresMiramar