Colorado Springs, CO Zoning

6 districts. 7 overlays.
This profile is an earlier edition — some fields may be incomplete. An updated profile is in progress.

Overview

Worth knowing
  • New UDC effective June 5, 2023 — full code rewrite (RetoolCOS 2021-2023) from 1990s-era ordinance. Code is less than 3 years old; expect ongoing amendments.
  • NNA-O (North Nevada Avenue Overlay) has its own use column in the base district use table — unusual for overlay to be integrated directly into base use table rather than modification table.
  • HP-O can be LESS restrictive than base zone on dimensional standards — Historic Preservation Board may recommend setback/height relief if preservation requires it.

+ 3 more in Quirks & notes

Districts

res_sf 5res_mf 1
CodeNameCategory Min lotHeight CoverageFAR Du/acParking Setbacks F/S/R
R-EstateEstate Residentialres_sf / /
R1-9000Single-Family 9,000 sfres_sf9,000 sf / /
R1-6000Single-Family 6,000 sfres_sf6,000 sf[1] / /
R-2Two-Family / Duplexres_sf / /
R-5Multi-Family Residentialres_mf / /
R-MHManufactured / Mobile Homeres_sf / /

Confidence: confirmed partial under review not found

Overlays

SSO
Streamside Overlay
ENV
UDC §7.3.5xx

Areas with intermittent and perennial streams; proximity-based from city maps

criteria11 review criteria: natural feature protection, wildlife preservation, stream bank stabilization, riparian buffers
guidelinesMust comply with Streamside Design Guidelines (separate document)
HSO
Hillside Overlay
HS
UDC §7.3.5xx

Areas with ridgelines, bluffs, rock outcroppings, significant slopes, wildlife habitat, geologic conditions

manualMust comply with Hillside Development Design Manual
standardsTerrain disturbance minimization, natural feature integration, visual impact mitigation
HP-O
Historic Preservation Overlay
HP
§7.2.501.B, §7.5.704

Properties designated by City Council through Historic Preservation Board review

reviewHistoric Preservation Board review for all exterior changes
relief_optionsBoard may recommend: reduced setbacks, height limit waiver, alley parking, up to 100% compact parking, up to 50% parking reduction
rezoningStrict rezoning criteria at §7.5.704.D
PPO
Planned Provisional Overlay
PD
UDC Part 7.2.6

Unique situations or relationships between new and existing development; Council action

noteEstablishes special procedures and/or development standards; sometimes called 'Conditions of Record'
HRO
High Rise Overlay
DT
UDC Part 7.2.6

Areas usually near downtown

effectAllows high-rise buildings with special height, floor area, and bulk limitations
noteSpecific height and FAR parameters not extracted
APO
Airport Overlay (AICUZ)
AP
UDC Part 7.2.6

Defined area around Colorado Springs Airport per Hillside and Airport Overlay Map

subzonesAPZ-1, APZ-2, Aircraft Navigation, Airport Noise, Runway Protection Zone
restrictionsHeight and incompatible use restrictions by subzone; FAA regulations govern max height
DFO
Design Flexibility Overlay
CON
§7.3.104.C

Works exclusively with R-Estate, R1-9000, and R1-6000 zone districts

effectMaximum design flexibility while ensuring character consistency with base zone

Adopted building codes

Denver & state buildings; home rule elsewhere

Local adoption
2021
2023
Local
IECC (Residential)
Local
IECC (Commercial)
Local

Click a code label to open its state-by-state adoption atlas.

Quirks & notes

  • New UDC effective June 5, 2023 — full code rewrite (RetoolCOS 2021-2023) from 1990s-era ordinance. Code is less than 3 years old; expect ongoing amendments.
  • NNA-O (North Nevada Avenue Overlay) has its own use column in the base district use table — unusual for overlay to be integrated directly into base use table rather than modification table.
  • HP-O can be LESS restrictive than base zone on dimensional standards — Historic Preservation Board may recommend setback/height relief if preservation requires it.
  • High-preemption state: CO has among the most active state zoning preemption agendas in the US. HB 24-1152 (ADU mandate), HB 24-1304 (parking near transit), additional lot size reform (HB 26-1114) in 2026.
  • City opposed HB 24-1152 ADU and HB 24-1304 parking mandates during 2024 legislative process but must now comply. ADU ordinance updated early 2025.
  • 6 mixed-use districts exist but names and dimensional standards not extracted.

Formulas

Definitions

height
Not extracted — see UDC §7.3.x and §7.4.2
lot_coverage
Not extracted — see UDC §7.4.2
far
Not extracted — see UDC §7.4.2
du_ac
Not extracted — see UDC §7.4.2
impervious_cover
setback_front
Not extracted — see UDC §7.4.2
setback_side
Not extracted
setback_rear
Not extracted
parking
Not extracted — see UDC; HB 24-1304 prohibits parking minimums near transit

Capacity calculations

max_footprint_sf
lot_area_sf * lot_coverage
max_gfa_sf
lot_area_sf * far
parking_required
units * parking

Massing explorer

Interactive 3D comparison across every district. Drag to orbit, scroll to zoom, use the slider to walk districts, and toggle applicable overlays in the right-side panel.

Sort by
LOW
HIGH
drag to orbit · scroll to zoom
Max height
ft
Floor area ratio
Lot coverage
%
Setbacks (F / S / R)
ft
Parking
/unit
Max density
du/ac
Min lot size
sf
Copy zoning profile
Loading…
District Category Height FAR Coverage Setbacks Parking Density Min lot Overlays

Sources & references

Citations
  1. [1] §7.2.204

Research status

Data quality

20%completeness10 confirmed20 partial5 inferred
Documented gaps
  • All base district dimensional standards (height, setbacks, FAR, lot coverage, parking) not extracted from UDC tables
  • 4+ additional residential district names not confirmed
  • 6 mixed-use district names and standards not extracted
  • 3 industrial district names and standards not extracted
  • High Rise Overlay specific height and FAR parameters not extracted

Known issues

schema:v1-legacypriority:lowdata:gaps-present

Other cities in this state

Nearest-alphabetical profiles. Click through to compare zoning patterns side-by-side.